Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 20CD1380000D2; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:30:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UDHiF-0001dv-Fp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:01:07 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UDHiF-0001dj-0k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:01:07 +0000 Received: from nm4-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.108.93]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDHiA-0007w8-7T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:01:05 +0000 Received: from [212.82.108.230] by nm4.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Mar 2013 17:00:41 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.176] by tm3.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Mar 2013 17:00:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp117.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Mar 2013 17:00:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1362589241; bh=Ylbu33/r3IJdCgaT+XIlH2qlhiobkDsCBTRmJFCYB60=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=XVqeC5lm9YP5VizabP2F77oOAbIs7BdAxDsDPaQUzY8p86IvwmvJxB8CzIZ9fNx30C1p/fmE+t4fkVnNk4BYgl1BOxyW8jdweSuXAsnGIahBxwgs9WRuLK/zWlSDjXzkm9u7IeN5bBKrlZxGcA6yUQvc5WMf53FaSRHyN+J2UdQ= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 609837.16961.bm@smtp117.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 8tNYNhYVM1mkwZIRHWFRyZLEtTWwuzh4odGPxRulL7vJHjW eZyrsW_6f_Gl4uLN1pzSb3v_7dc2CuXniAht92HlcfKNkQ8rd0Xl.mF.tyCe UQgIS2pulCwW52DaEbvaSrNz31lq55KcvsRUwz4NdM5op2PV4erhJG6B1XgJ MjjrffDLC_zcQDiz2NVWFQPHKzljsXb6QQimk_c6EzFEqFgLdmIts6FCv024 zAq0lCharPM0k1vz38a.PIelM._c.3F5M7_plKek0erC2QjS5sDVQP2cH.5v WBxgtWrTOmecrpau9oBYMe49XaskVAQiFyBPnY.JxbT93J1RIBpdtiVjzlqz h5GWqHxjSkBLZdvh1dVnboLcJVJZ1vhhxqaUfU0mv.0e7NqNBtJ3IzRAxbTT v3shECqq.6fIEUPJVn8ZelXkqeOjQXXwuc5wWsJdkjlqwTOfuhXsgcZn7_kj 7PGh9SVJDbg-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: .u8e2g.swBByWKjbpA3lR6Fw.2ZEQrJJpVsTSrpXLCffsPaCEMY- Received: from IBM7FFA209F07C (c.ashby435@81.156.245.163 with login) by smtp117.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Mar 2013 17:00:41 +0000 UTC Message-ID: <2C6AB608C0BB4D7BA9DB4F912E450D0D@IBM7FFA209F07C> From: "Chris" To: References: <51371E11.6020502@psk31.plus.com> <513746F3.7090508@psk31.plus.com> <84B77AD08F5F42849E6492B9048EC349@IBM7FFA209F07C> <51375C40.6050501@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <513761CD.8070107@psk31.plus.com> <51376AF3.9040409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51376C3C.80002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51377478.7040507@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:00:42 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan's RTTY beacon is starting to come through now. There have been periodic strong bursts of signal on 438.2kHz over the last hour or so, sounds like RTTY but fldigi not decoding using same settings as for Stefan - so no idea who or what. Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 4:53 PM Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.108.93 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 64437c466041e93ffedda7fb96b22b71 Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600d51377d406c4d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Stefan's RTTY beacon is starting to come through now. There have been periodic strong bursts of signal on 438.2kHz over the last hour or so, sounds like RTTY but fldigi not decoding using same settings as for Stefan - so no idea who or what. Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 4:53 PM Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK > It is not that slow and if it is the difference between a QSO and not, it > is worth a try. > > I see something now what mode is that? > > Amtor is about the same as the RTTY you have been trying. > > Eddie > > On 06/03/2013 16:18, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> >> Am 06.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >>> [...] >>> >>> I will now switch to MFSK-4, same QRG. >> >> Sorry, aborted. It is much to slow and so it is uninteresting when >> thinking about a real QSO mode.. >> How fast is AMTOR?? >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> > >