Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:42:23 +0000 (UTC)
From: M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Message-ID: <292094070.4610860.1468492943164.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <292094070.4610860.1468492943164.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi Alan and Andy

Many thanks for the info.

It is gratifying that my mails are actually getting onto the Black Sheep server. Up until now they have all been rejected and bounced back to me.

I use Yahoo mail directly on the web (in the cloud) as a web page not as a Post Box with desk top software.
 
Each of my specially setup and the fixed folders indicate if mail has been received in them. 

I direct all my mail unless from a contact listed sender to my trash folder that empties automatically every two weeks or about 200mails which includes the LF reflector. The philosophy being if its that important I will get a phone call or a letter. However I do check my trash and spam regularly (well within my two week limit) and not been caught out yet to my knowledge.

I have sent a mail to myself just now and it appeared in my In Box since my address in in my contact list.

I am sure you are right its a quirk of either Yahoo or my "Too Way" Ka band satellite Broad Band server connection. However its is only the Black Sheep (BS) reflector that seems to give me grief.

I understand that BS is not being supported now and living on borrowed time so to speak so I am not complaining just looking for observations that may help me to help myself

Regards and many thanks.
 

73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX 


--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 14/7/16, Alan Melia <alan.melia@btinternet.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
 Date: Thursday, 14 July, 2016, 10:49
 
 Pete re not getting your postings
 back from Blacksheep......have you checked 
 in the Spam folder in your webmail?? Yahoo regards mail sent
 to self as spam 
 !!
 
 Alan
 G3NYK
 
 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: "M0FMT" <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
 To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
 Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 10:37 AM
 Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
 
 
 Hi all
 
 I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep
 almost as 
 perplexing as why the DL listenership of SAQ is so much
 higher than 
 elsewhere.
 
 Population of Radio Amateurs and the proximity of DL land to
 SM no doubt 
 contributes, but the difference is so large. It has been
 consistently large 
 over many years.
 
 It could be that the listenership in G land is higher but
 don't report 
 in.... a bit unlikely.
 
 Many thanks for the suggestions.
 
 Oh apologies for highlighting such a boring topic.
 
 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX
 
 
 --------------------------------------------
 On Wed, 13/7/16, Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 
  Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
  To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
  Date: Wednesday, 13 July, 2016, 19:47
 
  And
  because it's chirpy CW and we've all moved on from
  that by now.Been there, done that
  Andy G4JNT
  On 13 July 2016 at 19:30,
  Chris <c.ashby435@btinternet.com>
  wrote:
  Probably
  because it's so easy and we've done it many times
  before?
 
  G4AYT.
 
  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter" <pws@df3lp.de>
 
  To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM
 
  Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
 
 
  Hi,
 
 
  On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote:
 
 
  ...
 
  Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at
 116
  ?
 
 
  Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK
  receiving SAQ ?
 
 
  Peter
 
 
  PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav