Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 359D238000095; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:09:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Si8HF-0007Dy-1P for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:08:13 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Si8HE-0007Dp-Dy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:08:12 +0100 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Si8HC-0000Oi-Ow for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:08:11 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.29.16]) by mwinf5d07 with ME id RW871j00B0LrbAy03W88st; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:08:08 +0200 Message-ID: <290FF3E2019C4AF8A140FEFEA8C18C98@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <4FE4AC54.3090901@legal-medicine.de> In-Reply-To: <4FE4AC54.3090901@legal-medicine.de> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:08:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120622-0, 22/06/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LOL as the webby folk say ! I think its just fine as its is , why, you can even post little graphics , directly with BS , very handy , the yahoo rejected the same file format , and came forth useful comments from those who have trod before , classical in every way [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 33d261536bb1467bb13d5764461d5ec4 Subject: Re: LF: Blacksheep and Yahoo Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:495984320:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60584fe4b4cb2b1a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none LOL as the webby folk say ! I think its just fine as its is , why, you can even post little graphics , directly with BS , very handy , the yahoo rejected the same file format , and came forth useful comments from those who have trod before , classical in every way Even a tetchy exchange last week , priceless as the advert used to say , classical , if its not broke , don't try and fix it ! And the rains stopped G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "pws" Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 6:33 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Blacksheep and Yahoo > Roger, > > You wrote: >> Just wondering how people think the current set-up is working? The recent >> poll suggested a large majority would be happy with a full migration to >> Yahoo, but we seem to now have a very messy split with postings in either >> place or both. >> ... > > 1. > After those boring incident at the VLF Group at Yahoo! > (look for "Schumann Resonance and Venus Transit" there) > I propose using Yahoo! for day-to-day postings and > Blacksheep for in-depth discussions. > > 2. > If you cannot live without those Yahoo! stuff use an > incognito without any call sign or full name. > Keep in mind that all postings there are fully open to > the world including all kinds of search engines, > data mining engines, etc. Ignoring that is naive. > > Peter, df3lp >