Message-ID: <28CB8EF648E7418BB5C2D4802F72C23C@IBM7FFA209F07C>
From: "Chris" <c.ashby435@btinternet.com>
To: "RSGB LF Group" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:04:13 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0025_01CDEB4D.8AB59EA0"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0025_01CDEB4D.8AB59EA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Who started the trend to have QRSS in the middle of the 'new' band? =
There are two extremely strong signals there now as I write this. I =
would have thought any mode that requires long plain carriers would be =
better suited to near the band edges.
Three German operators suggested a band plan during late September, in =
which QRSS was near the bottom of the band. As far as I remember this =
plan was met with some hostility.
It has been suggested that people will not stick to a band plan. I find =
this hard to believe, particularly in respect of QRSS, if they want =
their signals to be found.
Another problem I would suggest, is just how many know how to =
measure/calculate their EIRP? I have noticed several contributors to =
this reflector refer to ERP.
Food for thought?
Vy 73,
Chris, G4AYT.
------=_NextPart_000_0025_01CDEB4D.8AB59EA0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.19393">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Who started the trend to have QRSS in =
the middle of=20
the 'new' band? There are two extremely strong signals there now as I =
write=20
this. I would have thought any mode that requires long plain carriers =
would be=20
better suited to near the band edges.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Three German operators suggested a band =
plan during=20
late September, in which QRSS was near the bottom of the band. As far as =
I=20
remember this plan was met with some hostility.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>It has been suggested that people will =
not stick to=20
a band plan. I find this hard to believe, particularly in respect of =
QRSS, if=20
they want their signals to be found.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Another problem I would suggest, is =
just how many=20
know how to measure/calculate their EIRP? I have noticed several =
contributors to=20
this reflector refer to ERP.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Food for thought?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Vy 73,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Chris, =
G4AYT.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0025_01CDEB4D.8AB59EA0--