Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1181; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u24Hi7e5021426 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 18:44:07 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1abti1-0006Ri-6N for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 17:40:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1abti0-0006RZ-Gh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 17:40:12 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1abthy-0002D2-7h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 17:40:11 +0000 Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.237.142.178]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MWTfu-1aN1ZS2zAg-00XfBu; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:40:09 +0100 From: "Clemens Paul" To: Cc: References: <11D25B188E044E23AD2FD81806FA6F90@Clemens0811> <56D85B37.7070500@tele2.se> In-Reply-To: <56D85B37.7070500@tele2.se> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 18:40:07 +0100 Message-ID: <2883652E8C834D5CBEF849921163AC6C@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AdF1YzC3jzdM5FFOT62dA7DVqt3aMgA1ZGsQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:yAySKYjx65Cu3KLAEwPLKn9QsR4BujIx1g6ZgRUPa6OeZ+Ypmjk FE1z97oQ40Djf7PrCfEXTRKz4c42N0sDGd+r2zf7AzKXexzcon0nhCYMXYQvfVm8vLG5hiv 65HZMZE279Ud30MlptPoL+L2nRdxaaUgpl8Xt+wNcQkXXxn1TBupFiIZbdbhAYXv6nDAMP9 I3RCmu/YFIN5mC07eV2/Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:NaHmwrKs6dk=:e7iRlRjk/aAk2EnAfbfMRr mQ8oaLYMqldTF+lgTAj2bhsMxqfiW/cmmbwpB0JrdFFZEPWhw599mL3Vs+ZAXPqin1wn8du3M aRTXnLwQV3+RXfxL1EH+BdFiHkp+DGQHWa+PSBijufCQdmG4iTBikMI0Rh5bIH2E0NvXVvwTb b2em2bNWkfTA98v8FbNfuXKghuz5bvoIXG9P6IAxu+7xWP0QHmFGEJRvWovuNtDccuLmThTq8 /iPgiRCCMhr4ALXIr7mQDnKOcYpoo+zVvQQwNv3ZMjDS0IXrgrA1usMC+y/IValloUmrmJNPe zNVDlp+ywRoSTxBBwgcXyyW0j9LIs4adlrjLzL/c21qQZg1MbOQ8OaOd9KCX1IFLJq6lU9qK0 YJa9+ZMwcO901nT85T2jU4gQs362N6JOjjVwVHYZ7bypf+6I+HgjiAxJXGSJWntXmAJXprABl oXwVVgHi4tTeeY4qqFnwS3NW2GqwQxMOowIfY6z7QF78cWClR89s1BQitbB8aD4uHXOqpQpDh JGgzhFEcWvgmZIGMxNCrpgS47N0wN5ujNDgJbhSd3qD+N09pZIsc0i6IVme+Rmsz5rnl1W9zk PrAnVu6Q5kO6FNofIMvmjALM+VhX7dMmhwWSqCVAZIhQ6FR+8ysFNgflpT5rrRq3fP/s5LAw6 DOlhziYw+5m7sIx0bXsw/8eJ3HBB4KbQNoxcIZKf1YlHfizbb4TKVStBMCu470PGBtzAUEqox qTu9+46an6sVODNIRuDWYurelPUP2MbeK5qd1qY6+PCwvwuDSOwoVTQbLBnNrFDk5vJDx13h0 TL0XcS7 X-Scan-Signature: b707651713bcd4ad9db4bb0f5d794041 Subject: LF: RE: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: MF: DC-Bias [was: EbNaut] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id u24Hi7e5021426 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 7198 Hi Bodin & Tobias, see the article on ferrite losses with DC bias. https://www.dropbox.com/s/4zu1apz99mopmj6/03_Core_Losses_UnderDC.pdf?dl=0 @Tobias I know the article you've pointed to. It addresses only the special situation with a *single turn* center tapped primary winding of an output transformer which - according to the author's opinion - doesn't represent a real single turn due to the center feed. I was referring to a *multiturn* center tapped winding. See my spice simulation for a center tapped output tranformer as opposed a DC feed via chokes. https://www.dropbox.com/s/u252hmj1p9610bu/Center%20tap%20feed%20vs%20separate%20choke%20feed.png?dl=0 On the left side you find the circuit version with DC feeding via extra chokes (V.1). On the right there is the center tap version (V.2). As you can see the center tap is grounded for RF by 200nF and the DC feed has a choke for additional choking besides the transformer primary windings (in sum 10µH like in V.1). The current (yellow trace ) in the 50 Ohm load resistor R1 is identical in both versions hence you have the same output power in both circuits. But compare the currents in the transformer primaries of both versions. In V.1 this current (green trace) swings approx. between +/- 6A while in V.2 (with center tap) in the upper half of the winding the current swings between zero and -12A (green trace) and in the lower half between zero and +12A respectively (white trace) i.e. you have a current swing of +/-12A per cycle as opposed to V.1 with +/-6A per cycle. I conclude therefore that the flux in the core is doubled in V.2 (center tap). I also created a center tapped model with 2x10µH prim. so that the resistance to ground was the same for each FET as opposed to the floating primary with coupled 2x2.5µH = 10µH between the FETs. The result was just the same. So it seems that only the the DC current fed via the center tap can be the reason for the doubled current / flux in the transformer core in the center tap circuit. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk >[mailto:rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk] >Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 4:42 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk >Subject: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: MF: DC-Bias [was: EbNaut] > >But if the winding is bifilar, usually a twisted pair, then, from the >core's point of view, it will look almost like a single wire carrying >current in alternating directions. The core has no way of knowing that >there are two wires instead of one so it will "see" a pure AC >excitation. Am I missing something obvious? > >73 de >Johan SM6LKM > >cpaul@gmx.net wrote: >> Hi Markus, >> >>> Clemens, I think that saturation from DC-biasing would only be >>> a problem if the two transformer primaries (LP1 and LP2) were >>> wound on separate cores. On a single toroid, the flux from the >>> two DC currents should cancel. >> It would appear that the flux from the two DC currents will >not cancel because they don't flow at one time. >> The current into the center tap alternates from travelling >through one half of the winding then the >> other due to the push pull action of the FETs. >> >> 73 >> Clemens >> DL4RAJ >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of >Markus Vester >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 12:03 AM >>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> Subject: Re: LF: MF: EbNaut >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------ >> Posted by: "Clemens Paul" >> ------------------------------------ >> >> >> ------------------------------------ >> >> Yahoo Groups Links >> >> >> >> > > > >------------------------------------ > >------------------------------------ > > >------------------------------------ > >Yahoo Groups Links > ><*> To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/ > ><*> Your email settings: > Individual Email | Traditional > ><*> To change settings online go to: > http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/join > (Yahoo! ID required) > ><*> To change settings via email: > rsgb_lf_group-digest@yahoogroups.co.uk > rsgb_lf_group-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.co.uk > ><*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > rsgb_lf_group-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk > ><*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to: > https://info.yahoo.com/legal/uk/yahoo/utos/en-gb/details.html >