Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w97IpAOi004398 for ; Sun, 7 Oct 2018 20:51:18 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1g9E0Q-0001s1-F5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2018 19:42:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1g9E0P-0001rs-O6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2018 19:42:17 +0100 Received: from smtp-out-1.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.65]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1g9E0O-0005eA-5Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2018 19:42:16 +0100 Received: from mal ([88.104.1.72]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id 9E0NggJkzwhzS9E0Nglsz6; Sun, 07 Oct 2018 19:42:15 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=talktalk.net Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=talktalk.net; s=cmr1711; t=1538937735; bh=9yGigsEU+sj1JfgDTg8Kr9L/KEEz7nVaBBhCq5OVUDA=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=IMVimQUMcM1tMXU/AO6xZImr63bJWxIw3q4mrRraqsTLSXMNC5Yknf4aXdCsc7FXC 67Wq41XRVwwmeNOhtO81SaEOtdUjmAFr5VNIWoXj3ipIXWYXuHUp4KscgGCPLUcozd wwyQhiwt/00ROQoBU8tFluJbeu5Ff4TECgcabBtc= X-Originating-IP: [88.104.1.72] X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.3 cv=e8Iot5h/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=oLFlnT8c2Bb0h2QgbgxInQ==:117 a=oLFlnT8c2Bb0h2QgbgxInQ==:17 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=nN7BH9HXAAAA:8 a=GoqwstHNAAAA:8 a=MEt4V6EG0iirPpyIlkcA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=SoPXeTrgLKDhnNAvzzAA:9 a=Ji3NEYRbDJxSglde:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=slCku8JSH3TyizEDQ3pD:22 a=aif6eW07jeEVVZOP0pFm:22 Message-ID: <2880518DFB0C4878B311170EFC6DF377@mal> From: To: References: <6135EFFF517445048C7BB5C0F0D7C033@mal> <4B51EB2309974340BA79994A6F1B9DA3@SV8CS> <2dbe4808342c7d21d2b68aa1683006d2@smtp.hushmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2dbe4808342c7d21d2b68aa1683006d2@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2018 19:42:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEJQk7RVoJ+T1alAh6YxHmreG44z6vzyBfRcWNMxI5QBhS686peDZp9Mi/XfK0DR2NwMDYY67xzOeKbZoOo3QWugqfFiN7n4B94W8I7tdyJ56BOnrDOr 66FiR8VrMk8wV7EEPuKOeCcZ2p0wDEdszlBIs2RYdcmVyQEh430t1IgD X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Yes two separate systems then able to select appropriate mode when someone responds and mute the non responder for the duration of the QSO. This is probably beyond your comprehension. The SUBJECT line specifies MF You seem CONFUSED!!!!!!!!!!!! [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.135.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b14bcaca65d4b584f77d02a84d381cb4 Subject: LF: Re: CW es FT8 MF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01D45E75.D877C720" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01D45E75.D877C720 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes two separate systems then able to select appropriate mode when = someone responds and mute the non responder for the duration of the QSO. = This is probably beyond your comprehension. The SUBJECT line specifies = MF You seem CONFUSED!!!!!!!!!!!! From: Tony Baldwin=20 Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2018 5:31 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: CW es FT8 MF Both of them, he's trying out his new fangled spark transmitter ;-) Tony (didn't post that) On 07/10/2018 17:13, SV8CS-Spiros Chimarios wrote: QRG? MF or LF? SV8CS From: g3kevmal@talktalk.net=20 Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2018 09:41 To: rsgb ; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk=20 Subject: LF: CW es FT8 MF Active now on CW es FT8 pse call de mal./g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01D45E75.D877C720 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes two separate systems then able to select appropriate mode when = someone=20 responds and mute the non responder for the duration of the QSO. This is = probably beyond your comprehension. The SUBJECT line specifies MF
You seem CONFUSED!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
 
 
Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2018 5:31 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =
Subject: Re: LF: CW es FT8 MF
 
Both=20 of them, he's trying out his new fangled spark transmitter = ;-)

Tony=20 (didn't post that)

On 07/10/2018 17:13, SV8CS-Spiros Chimarios = wrote:
QRG? MF or LF?
SV8CS
 
Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2018 09:41
Subject: LF: CW es FT8 MF
 
Active now on CW es FT8 pse call
de mal./g3kev
=
 

------=_NextPart_000_0009_01D45E75.D877C720--