Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_40_50,
	HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=3.1.3
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id sBUEmlQG025884
	for <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:48:47 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Y5y0D-0000dN-Hr
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:42:29 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Y5y0D-0000dE-9B
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:42:29 +0000
Received: from smtp-out01.xworks.net ([31.25.48.13])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de>)
	id 1Y5y0A-00062D-VJ
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:42:28 +0000
Received: from MAILBACKEND4 (cluster06.xworks.net [10.100.1.80])
	by smtp-out01.xworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C059661592
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:42:25 +0100 (CET)
X-DKIM-Result: Domain=kabelmail.de Result=Signature OK
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de;
	s=mail; t=1419950545;
	bh=1XyHxB/0yXyaDTZbZlF8N7f4+JHo2j5URH8ryhHXl6Y=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject;
	b=tBsSMRHIXUQgkcFq6Qa79Z63oMsiVOubnjLY8EWM+M2nyC3cluQNNVGop9S1iTqdu
	 k+rdEZPlPvxf3oCrIIcDTqJcWA3dYeWJiMApYPe0/XvQfHSl8JMdvn4I5sjdndDbrE
	 69wQPNDi5NB0EYKBMy+yt+mpuPd91uaNPOvBSk3w=
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:42:24 +0100
From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Message-ID: <2873b8b747ae40df8f4f368654b2060e@kabelmail.de>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scan-Signature: 4f449c45f7b1894a9195a328eedaeb30
Subject: Re: Re: VLF: 8270 Hz BPSK
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----8653DCE401D2482DA1552E6DD97825E0"
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                 
X-UID: 1669

------8653DCE401D2482DA1552E6DD97825E0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The machine is ready for the next attempt, same constellation=2E=20

Waiting for better TX=20

Uwe =20

Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
 Gesendet: 30=2E12=2E2014 14:54
 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
 Betreff: Re: VLF: 8270 Hz BPSK

 Am 30=2E12=2E2014 14:34, schrieb Paul Nicholson:
 > Uwe DJ8WX wrote:
 >
 > > the begin of the message is exactly 11:00:00 UT=2E
 >
 > Sorry, I could not decode any message=2E There is some unknown
 > timing delay from the PLL so I searched from 10:59:59=2E5 to
 > 11:00:05 but could not decode anything=2E I tried combining E
 > and H receivers but that didn't help=2E
 >
 > The carrier sent before the message had S/N about 3dB weaker
 > than your signal in November=2E That would have been enough to
 > make a decode with 10 second symbols unlikely=2E
 >
 > Unfortunately Wolf's on-line receiver was down for maintenance
 > so I couldn't borrow a signal from there to try=2E
 >
 It's on again, with a replaced frontend, but the signal levels need to=
=20
 be adjusted later today (after darkness)=2E

 Cheers and hny everyone,
 Wolf =2E
------8653DCE401D2482DA1552E6DD97825E0
Content-type: text/html; charset=Windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div style=3D"margin: 5px;padding:0;font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px=
;"><p><span>The machine is ready for the next attempt, same constellati=
on=2E</span></p>
<p><span>Waiting for better TX</span></p>
<p><span>Uwe </span></p>
<br />
<div style=3D"background-color: #f9f9f9; line-height: 20px; padding: 5p=
x; border-top: 1px solid #dfdfdf;" class=3D"replyHeader"><strong style=3D=
"width: 80px; display: inline-block; font-size: 95%;">Von:</strong> rsg=
b_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg<br />
<strong style=3D"width: 80px; display: inline-block; font-size: 95%;">G=
esendet:</strong> 30=2E12=2E2014 14:54<br />
<strong style=3D"width: 80px; display: inline-block; font-size: 95%;">A=
n:</strong> rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg<br />
<strong style=3D"width: 80px; display: inline-block; font-size: 95%;">B=
etreff:</strong> Re: VLF: 8270 Hz BPSK<br />
</div>
<br />
Am 30=2E12=2E2014 14:34, schrieb Paul Nicholson:<br />
&gt; Uwe DJ8WX wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; the begin of the message is exactly 11:00:00 UT=2E<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Sorry, I could not decode any message=2E  There is some unknown<br=
 />
&gt; timing delay from the PLL so I searched from 10:59:59=2E5 to<br />
&gt; 11:00:05 but could not decode anything=2E  I tried combining E<br =
/>
&gt; and H receivers but that didn't help=2E<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The carrier sent before the message had S/N about 3dB weaker<br />
&gt; than your signal in November=2E  That would have been enough to<br=
 />
&gt; make a decode with 10 second symbols unlikely=2E<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Unfortunately Wolf's on-line receiver was down for maintenance<br =
/>
&gt; so I couldn't borrow a signal from there to try=2E<br />
&gt;<br />
It's on again, with a replaced frontend, but the signal levels need to =
<br />
be adjusted later today (after darkness)=2E<br />
<br />
Cheers and hny everyone,<br />
Wolf =2E<br />
<br /></div>
------8653DCE401D2482DA1552E6DD97825E0--