Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.1.100 with SMTP id 4csp184095igl; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:26:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.198.146 with SMTP id jc18mr16605969wic.61.1374078417361; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j8si2960818wjz.93.2013.07.17.09.26.56 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UzUGd-0007vg-Ox for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:07:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UzUGd-0007vX-BW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:07:51 +0100 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UzUGb-0004Wi-7m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:07:50 +0100 Received: from AGB ([95.145.211.170]) by mwinf5d55 with ME id 1U7l1m00L3h8Utr03U7lkX; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:07:48 +0200 Message-ID: <2857F05E962A4C27AA528CB4B2028DD0@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:07:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Possible ..... ? From: DAVE PICK Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:45 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: HF or u Wave Convention ? They are asking for people to give talks, surely someone on here could do one? Graham?... [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 60b21f5b7eb190e65b65540006a87038 Subject: Re: LF: HF or u Wave Convention ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002E_01CE8310.2813BA60" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2364 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01CE8310.2813BA60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Possible ..... ? From: DAVE PICK=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:45 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: HF or u Wave Convention ? They are asking for people to give talks, surely someone on here could = do one? Graham?... Not me, I've done it before! Dave G3YXM On 16 July 2013 23:30, Graham wrote: Interesting comment from another world , was bad enough last year , so = what's on the menu for LF/MF/HF then ? G. > > >>> Convention. There is a greater emphasis on VHF and above this = year, > > >>> largely due to the influence of the new RSGB board chairman, = Graham, > > >>> G4FSG. Graham is a regular 4m operator and microwaver. > ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01CE8310.2813BA60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Possible .....  ?

From: DAVE PICK
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: LF: HF or u Wave Convention ?

They are asking for people to give talks, surely someone on here = could do=20 one? Graham?...

Not me, I've done it = before!

Dave=20 G3YXM


On 16 July 2013 23:30, Graham <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
Interesting comment from another world , was bad enough last year = , so=20
what's on the menu for LF/MF/HF then ?

G.


> = >=20 >>> Convention. There is a greater emphasis on VHF and above = this=20 year,
> > >>> largely due to the influence of the = new RSGB=20 board chairman, Graham,
> > >>> G4FSG. Graham is a = regular=20 4m operator and=20 microwaver.
>

------=_NextPart_000_002E_01CE8310.2813BA60--