Return-Path: Received: from rly-dc08.mx.aol.com (rly-dc08.mail.aol.com [172.19.136.37]) by air-dc05.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDC052-b394ad3b415395; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:56:28 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dc08.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDC085-b394ad3b415395; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:56:23 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1MxTnE-0008BP-Mk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:55:04 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1MxTnD-0008BG-Uh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:55:03 +0100 Received: from web28107.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.127]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MxTn3-0001Rt-Ev for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:54:53 +0100 Received: (qmail 38928 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Oct 2009 22:54:47 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1255388087; bh=PttYOvssdW8w0abBnhDqWFMklGce3vFk9tYaCMqfLY0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NI+euBMG2hQ41y6OHGl74oJB/OPc4QKdXG2aF3bXnhfc+lunWCLs4a4ZY+nGXpYQvufWnU/EWiksuHq49GCfLTY940MFeIJCgqY048q9mZQ3FBcgzLnD8592ope6fpZqRNlA9iQhT8Ct9GXoAg/esC1+nkxP4VEYjBvYmH2CRQ0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=zkqAuJDRIrbey7XyCD8so/6FKoIxX6xkKN2SuCBhp8HpaQO+9OptpmurXe4BRuHElD7vl4tUBRI8POPBLE+qKVO8Mu5DHtCJJhGekqdpAZzBGWP1SFuwxbmryHvKZNbn0RsvJQISSRH5CkASyARZued+Q66MH4/ohJtWxITiV44=; Message-ID: <278359.38612.qm@web28107.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: obnt4cQVM1n3KXuVSwafe8xj6OX8Dsw3MSu8tdOWbGgApv2RFXovwlrvFDPHHJKMeHXO9f47yqNp3B.zk4ipvZ7tCQoC5mVzapcog2U3IHmo9OSeF80xFv8olNxCluVkiOr4GuPtE4_F6l272sDLX3y4C7hcr5F_xdvpauASaMDT5GeAsCsRWM3Lp691Tl7BxGtf1cNzCMVZ9mL9yfY3m69N_t4WzEIfmDNtvFetdcZNftdA.MtUVaWjkUy8uktmIXp9eDz7prAW1brfjIBJj0egudDZ5bbXbZ5USjLy8MRA2mADoTpVe_KGLm.XzXT5nhTZWsJQEYad Received: from [86.136.44.215] by web28107.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:54:46 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/7.0.14 YahooMailWebService/0.7.347.3 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:54:46 -0700 (PDT) From: M0FMT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <1255365325.4ad35acd6c922@imp.netikka.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: ADSL noise Q for petefmt Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1053670295-1255388086=:38612" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m210.1 ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : pass --0-1053670295-1255388086=:38612 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Paul-Henrik and Graham =A0 Yes very depressing for us with the potentilal problems=A0from "new techno= logy".=20 I have to do as Graham says find a quiet spot and exploit that if=A0I can= find one. =A0 Well it looks like conditions are on the up for the winter season so may= be it will help get better signals from each other. If I make any great= breakthroughs with my noise issue rest assured =A0I will broadcast it. =A0 In the meantime thanks for your interest and info. =A0 BTW I intend to try some late night QRSS from a qrp 137kc/s TX when our po= stal service starts to play the game again. I have a 137.77 xtal stuck=A0i= n the post right now.. =A0 73 all petefmt --- On Mon, 12/10/09, Paul-Henrik wrote: From: Paul-Henrik Subject: LF: ADSL noise Q for petefmt To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Monday, 12 October, 2009, 5:35 PM Hello Pete, LF > Well I can only conclude it is ADSL because it is > just raising the noise floor it is=A0very subtle not really identifiable= like > say TV LTB, it's a mush. Frame ants help a bit but not as sensitive at= the LW > by a mile. > 73 petefmt I'm also plagued by a "not really identifiable" mush-like noisefloor. In= my case it is not affecting RX on 500kHz badly, at least I seem to hear you guys= pretty well and daytime the band sounds pretty fine. Here the problems start in= the high end of the MW BC band and extends up to about 2600kHz with a constant level. Above 2600kHz it slowly drops off and at 3000kHz it is more or less gone. The noise has no real characteristic, it is like a constant 24/7/365 white= noise (S7 on IC-718 with inverted-L antenna) and I can not D/F it on any of my= loops. I have even disconnected all incoming mains and phone lines to the house= just above earth level and ran the radio from a battery but it is still there..= . I have tried to nail this pest many times but always failed so far. A clue= to what kind of technology that could cause white noise in this spectrum woul= d be very helpful in the battle. Thankful for any hints. Then a word of warning as this may soon affect many of us: On top of this the local electric company recently installed smart billing meters in our area running LonTalk over 4800baud FSK PLC on 66.7kHz. The= 2'nd harmonic sidebands of this EU approved complete engineering failure piece= of crap technology are now wiping out 136kHz completely daytime... With night= time QRN it just about "blends in" when using a 250Hz CW filter. The signal is= all over in every cm of mains wiring indoors too. At least I know my enemy in= this case but being approved technology used for every household means there is= very little to do but live with it. 73 Paul-Henrik / OH1LSQ =20 --0-1053670295-1255388086=:38612 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Paul-Henrik and Graham
 
Yes very depressing for us with the potentilal problems from "ne= w technology".
I have to do as Graham says find a quiet spot and exploit that if&nbs= p;I can find one.
 
Well it looks like conditions are on the up for the winter season so= may be it will help get better signals from each other. If I make any gre= at breakthroughs with my noise issue rest assured  I will broadcast= it.
 
In the meantime thanks for your interest and info.
 
BTW I intend to try some late night QRSS from a qrp 137kc/s TX when= our postal service starts to play the game again. I have a 137.77 xtal st= uck in the post right now..
 
73 all petefmt

--- On Mon, 12/10/09, Paul-Henrik <phl= @netikka.fi> wrote:

From: Paul-Henrik <phl@netikka.fi>
Su= bject: LF: ADSL noise Q for petefmt
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.orgDate: Monday, 12 October, 2009, 5:35 PM

Hello Pete, LF

> Well I can only conclude= it is ADSL because it is
> just raising the noise floor it is = very subtle not really identifiable like
> say TV LTB, it's a mush.= Frame ants help a bit but not as sensitive at the LW
> by a mile.
> 73 petefmt

I'm also plagued by a "not really identifiabl= e" mush-like noisefloor. In my case
it is not affecting RX on 500kHz ba= dly, at least I seem to hear you guys pretty
well and daytime the band= sounds pretty fine. Here the problems start in the
high end of the MW= BC band and extends up to about 2600kHz with a constant
level. Above= 2600kHz it slowly drops off and at 3000kHz it is more or less
gone.
The noise has no real characteristic, it is like a constant 24/7/365= white noise
(S7 on IC-718 with inverted-L antenna) and I can not D/F= it on any of my loops.

I have even disconnected all incoming mains= and phone lines to the house just
above earth level and ran the radio from a battery= but it is still there...

I have tried to nail this pest many times= but always failed so far. A clue to
what kind of technology that could= cause white noise in this spectrum would be
very helpful in the battle= .

Thankful for any hints.


Then a word of warning as this= may soon affect many of us:

On top of this the local electric comp= any recently installed smart billing
meters in our area running LonTalk= over 4800baud FSK PLC on 66.7kHz. The 2'nd
harmonic sidebands of this= EU approved complete engineering failure piece of
crap technology are= now wiping out 136kHz completely daytime... With nighttime
QRN it just= about "blends in" when using a 250Hz CW filter. The signal is all
over= in every cm of mains wiring indoors too. At least I know my enemy in this=
case but being approved technology used for every household means ther= e is very
little to do but live with it.

73

Paul-Henrik / OH1= LSQ







=20 --0-1053670295-1255388086=:38612--