Message-ID: <27715.200001121314@gemini>
From: "James Moritz" <j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk>
Organization: University of Hertfordshire
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 13:13:13 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: LF: Calculating distributed C for inductors
In-reply-to: <005701bf5c9e$23b33b00$c60dd6cf@test>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Dear LF Group,

Re: Loops and stray capacitance measurements.

All these methods will give you a rough idea of the stray 
capacitance; but results will be somewhat variable, since they 
assume that the loop can be modelled as an inductor with some 
stray capacitance in paralell. An actual loop antenna, due to it's  
construction, has distributed capacitance and inductance, so a 
more realistic model would be a network of transmission lines. I 
think models have been devised for single turn loops, but I am not 
aware of any for a multi turn loop. My maths isn't up to it, i'm afraid!
	
In practice, this means the experimental value of stray C varies 
depending on what the measuring frequency is - the effect gets 
worse the closer you get to the self resonant frequency, and the 
nearer the length of wire in the winding approaches the 
wavelength. I seem to remember the apparent stray capacitance 
goes down as the frequency goes up. 

What this means to loop-makers is you have to take the 
measurements with a large pinch of salt. Dont be suprised if the 
resuts are inconsistent. In general, higher Q and therefore better 
sensitivity occur with low stray capacitance and thick wire.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU