Return-Path: Received: from rly-md08.mx.aol.com (rly-md08.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.146]) by air-md08.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMD084-92047b6295ad8; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:08:09 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md08.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD088-92047b6295ad8; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:07:57 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JQAaZ-0003i2-RV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:07:31 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JQAaZ-0003ht-9f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:07:31 +0000 Received: from mcgi12.rambler.ru ([81.19.67.190]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JQAaW-0000nN-5f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:07:31 +0000 Received: from mcgi12.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mcgi12.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525D03B for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:07:22 +0300 (MSK) Received: from [85.141.89.77] by mcgi12.rambler.ru with HTTP (mailimap); Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:07:17 +0300 From: "Roman ." To: Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:07:17 +0300 Content-Disposition: inline MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <272178355.1203120437.176205068.98835@mcgi12.rambler.ru> X-Mailer: Ramail 3, (aten) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: CW Skimmer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : ~ Tell me please, Pat, sir Samuel Morse is rx'd Morse code orally?) Why all radio-amateurs in all country make a 'religion' from the knack=20 of receiving Morse orally? The frontire of the Radio now - is a Computing devices + Programming +=20 Radio equipment. The 1 tube TX + key-bug is a history of the Radio. Modern Radio is need a good 'users'. This is a reality. Of course, the knowledge level for the designing computer devices and=20 programming must be more high, then for design 1-tube-tx! Therefore the number of designers not so great now. 1000/1 as usual. If you like Radio and you a good user why you are is not radio-amateur? * G4gvw@aol.com [Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:23:03 EST]: > Actualy I do not agree with that statement. It is only in the present > state > of the art that you might say that a machine cannot read poorly sent > morse. It > is not so many years ago that the present state of the art was > considered > beyond the reach of machines! > > It is surely not beyond the wit of man to imagine that a future > generation > of machines and their programmes (I hesitate to use the word software > deliberately) might not only decode a data stream called "morse" but > actually > interpret its "meaning" using rules based on language, useage and > machine-based > artificial intelligence! > > In the same way that the modern radio amateur has become an operator=20 of > "black boxes" who is to say that the next generation of Black Boxes=20 will > not > become an operator of radio amateurs? > > Some would say that this is alraeady the case! > > > > > 73 de Pat G4GVW es gd dx > Qth near Felixstowe, UK > > > > > > -- Roman ..