Return-Path: Received: from rly-db06.mx.aol.com (rly-db06.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.81]) by air-db06.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDB062-acf4b2b5043201; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:50:05 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db06.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB065-acf4b2b5043201; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:49:56 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NLZOx-0008N3-GV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:45:35 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NLZOx-0008Mu-1c for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:45:35 +0000 Received: from n74.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([98.136.44.186]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NLZRg-0002Me-OZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:48:25 +0000 Received: from [216.252.122.219] by n74.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Dec 2009 09:48:52 -0000 Received: from [68.142.200.227] by t4.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Dec 2009 09:48:52 -0000 Received: from [68.142.201.69] by t8.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Dec 2009 09:48:51 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp421.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Dec 2009 09:48:51 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 892729.2182.bm@omp421.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 80187 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2009 09:48:51 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=SOMGw+LPy/SOXf8tkpWntOjLZ12xyoImcU5o4plHEFPfPPDQiOMw9MZLiUjnB3foKt/iMbMZLf6Nm/0ls42dGwFnw3rEM3WPVXVA0Dof0XP3sJ578vq1DceQBIcuXIWBP3KOYUUeU/h3jw8V9blWz3YyoGCFnnE1HMxf4Zf3s2Y= ; Received: from host86-151-140-44.range86-151.btcentralplus.com (ken.h.wright@86.151.140.44 with login) by smtp139.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2009 01:48:51 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: 9Y6mUHuswBAgnrOsukIiNdFDf95uy_Dz34nY1hlg2liKgYD952sjbg-- X-YMail-OSG: Gz_.Jm8VM1kNaf6r7hwnrQfEmOtIO8UrHb0xQ68cfaieOR9apt7Coxto35QUkcnao08eXQd3LBD4IfFxL3jNMDLekSO7O72KB9nrYqv5qJPmCwSWIcRDfe_CYUspV734iwRcN6ulfBTDv_Va541Gdz_50zpZAiIA8WZY08B6IOd2aDb1BEV.pbAh8DPse.sox0PBI_kmdaowJkliZAGAciNjkltkwDIoUd_byFvo1fz7uzrwtLKFFwUz7SD12Ookmec7YsaMjwNA7D33vM4FYQNwtCitzHQVsjSNFY363ZRldyXvQw8Ard04veS_m801.eqVsKZgdYDXrpfkLxEUeeI9JYG035uDZEFoQaBnFA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <264E8DA6D7864F87BDA5D339F0900968@lindavideo> From: "Ken" To: References: <1542517694@web.de> <6F962616C1CC4C1B844AF099CB1BB55D@lindavideo> <000f01ca7fc2$c666f6a0$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:48:50 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: RE: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX signals Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-15"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 As an addition to my last posting on this subject be careful if you see optical cards for sale at rallies etc, they all should/must have the laser 'starburst' symbol on them, and may be labelled as either, laser product, class 1 laser, or class 3 laser, what they will not tell you is the power output, you will need a calibrated optical power meter for this, or the wavelength, which could be 850nm multi 73. Ken M0KHW mode, 1300nm single mode or 1550nm single mode. When I was working on optical systems the standard BT optical connector for main network single mode fibre was the FC type, originally manufactured by Seiko.. ----- Original Message ----- From: "mal hamilton" To: Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 9:16 AM Subject: LF: Re: Re: RE: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX signals > Radio Amateurs BEWARE - Appliance Operators DO NOT TOUCH > > G3KEV > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ken" > To: > Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:43 AM > Subject: LF: Re: RE: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX > signals > > >> Optical fibres are fine for transmission and remove all the problems of >> interference and cross talk at a stroke, but please be careful and >> observe >> optical safety precautions when using lasers and other light sources. I >> worked on optical systems for many years during my time with BT, and > optical >> safety took priority over every thing else. All optical fibres need to > have >> a perfect cleave on the ends, and the connectors be absolutely clean, if >> you are not launching into an optical connector then alignment will be a >> problem, similarly at the receive end. >> >> >> 73. >> Ken >> >> M0KHW >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Horst Stöcker" >> To: >> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:01 AM >> Subject: LF: RE: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX > signals >> >> >> In theory it's a good Idea which I had some weeks before without working > it >> out. >> >> Years before I also have made tests with FTA (free to air) optical >> transmissions with a DL2CH-Transceiver and a TRX-Kit by Aatis which is > quite >> much simpler. >> Even with that it was no problem to link between two points about a few >> meters. >> >> In this case you should think about an IR-LED. Unfortunately, the Aatis >> receiver has a photo transistor instead of a diode. But it should be no >> great deal to modify that. >> >> The problems with FTA optic transmission for this application are imho: >> - You have to be sure, that no one can be injured by the laser beam, >> especially at unattended operation. >> - Think about how many hours/the beam has it's full power before becoming >> much weaker. >> - The optics must be kept clean. This could be a problem if the units are >> out of reach. >> - The units have to be mounted absolutely stable. For Example, on a > swinging >> fibre rod you'll never bring a laser beam exactly to the rx area. >> >> I bet, (FTA) optical transmission just changes one problem with a few >> others. >> >> But the transmission with optical cable seems interesting. >> >> What type of cable do you suggest? I do not think, my TOS-Link cable >> would >> stand weather/UV and mechanical conditions outside for a long time. >> >> Horst DO1KHS >> ___________________________________________________________ >> Preisknaller: WEB.DE DSL Flatrate für nur 16,99 Euro/mtl.! >> http://produkte.web.de/go/02/ >> >> >> >> > >