Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.142.105 with SMTP id rv9csp407171igb; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:27:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.219.70 with SMTP id pm6mr772543wjc.53.1403130453656; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id xn13si4433636wib.13.2014.06.18.15.27.33 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: none (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WxMKb-0006Ej-BF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:19:41 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WxMKb-0006Ea-0i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:19:41 +0100 Received: from smtpout3.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.59] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WxMKY-0001LC-TN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:19:39 +0100 Received: from AGB ([95.145.231.170]) by mwinf5d34 with ME id FwKe1o0073hEYzB03wKe9Z; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:19:38 +0200 X-ME-Helo: AGB X-ME-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:19:38 +0200 X-ME-IP: 95.145.231.170 Message-ID: <263618661A87432CAD52A5922941D5ED@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <890FEB25EF8D41A2A9843DC7D7972D3F@PCFIXE> <8D1588BE7B132A5-2024-D718@webmail-m237.sysops.aol.com> <0D65E2D5B33E454CBBBA70E173A51425@AGB> <53A0BBAC.9030803@gmail.com> <20140617223859.Horde.suUdzUDUx2ua3dsFDcvN8g1@posti.anvianet.fi> <20140618112356.Horde.w3hY7UPcNXQNRpET7dQ4tQ8@posti.anvianet.fi> <20140618175842.Horde.mF3mR0NUi0-gYNZbN367hg1@posti.anvianet.fi> In-Reply-To: <20140618175842.Horde.mF3mR0NUi0-gYNZbN367hg1@posti.anvianet.fi> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:19:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul , > I can not find any "mirrors" below 14.4 MHz, but above that hell breaks > loose... Yes , can be disconcerting , when you have unexpected signals ! [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: ee37f4b261e58bbaf6a18fc5319c092e Subject: Re: LF: MF CW now! Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Paul , > I can not find any "mirrors" below 14.4 MHz, but above that hell breaks > loose... Yes , can be disconcerting , when you have unexpected signals ! freezes. Maybe a USB-system limitation? That's possible , there was some posts round this , over the 10MHz [still in dev] airspy version The input cct is not as simple as first thought as there is agc and gain roll off to LF , but since the sdrsharp gang managed to acquire the programming 'book' and contacted the developer of the main chip , who was , apparently amazed to find his chip being used for this , more b/w and features have been unlocked .. GL-73-G, -------------------------------------------------- From: Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 6:58 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: MF CW now! > Hello Graham, LF > > I'm using the +I and -I inputs that were connected to the R820 tuner chip > before. > > The 1:4 matching transformer is not my own idea, I just made my > transformer a bit beefier than the design I borrowed from. It had a > FT37-43 core that provided a minimum frequency of 1500 kHz at 50 ohms > system impedance with the given number of turns. > > RF transformer rule of thumb: XL at min frequency = 4 x system impedance. > > > Various "sources" on the web claim that the AD input impedance is highly > undefined, or at least not specified. However the article I borrowed the > 1:4 XFRM idea from claimed it had some merits without going deeper on the > subject. > > > I can not find any "mirrors" below 14.4 MHz, but above that hell breaks > loose... so I added a simple PI LPF at around 15 MHz with the main > intention to make sure no strong VHF-signals make it to the AD-chip. > > You can see at least 2.4 MHz chunks of spectrum although there are > settings above that. The higher settings above 2.4 MHz don't produce good > results with my setup, signals get choppy or I get temporary freezes. > Maybe a USB-system limitation? If I go below 1 MHz strange things also > start to happen and mirrors appear. Running the standard 2.4 MHz seems to > be the best option for me. > > > You can probably make a dual-purpose device from a stick that has the > R820 tuner that connects to the AD using only +I and -I since the +Q > and -Q inputs are then free to use as the direct sampling input to the > AD. I wanted to try this but my eyes and hands don't cope too well with > the tiny dimensions since +Q and -Q are not brought out to any pads on my > stick. Therefore I just soldered away the coupling capacitors going to +I > and -I and then used their pads for interfacing my transformer. > > > The article that spurred my modding interest was in the last swedish > magazine QTC, but very similar mods are all around the web. > > > Hope I did not add confusion. > > BR > > Paul-Henrik > > > > Quoting Graham : > >> Ok Paul, >> >> Its round the Q and Q + not Q , configuration , the latest >> drivers allow that to be selected , the single feed seems to >> work fine , but still needs some filtering to prevent images .. >> >> I think, possibly a pass band limited pre-amp would help for >> MF/LF , the gain drop's past a couple of MHz and the 200 ohms z >> needs some matching , may be the mini-whip is providing this aspect >> ? >> >> There are image responses linked to the sample rate , a pre-selector >> as opposed to a 'tuner' would be 'ok' for HF , I think . >> >> I have another 'now' low band dongle . used to be high band , but >> after a 7 MHz session , with it connected to a 10 mtr Ae , the vhf >> front failed .. so that's a candidate for mf/lf conversion , >> these have two life's ! >> >> One of Jim's two active device band limited pre-amps , with 200 >> ohms o/p z would be ideal , or use the toroid as the o/p coupling >> device ? that may be the most elegant configuration ? >> >> 73-G, >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: >> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 12:23 PM >> To: >> Subject: Re: LF: MF CW now! >> >>> Hello Graham, LF >>> >>> To be honest I have not tried other feeding methods for the AD than a >>> trifilar 1:4 transformer. I used a beefier toroid (FT50-43) and more >>> turns to get a XL of 200 ohms at 400 kHz for the 50 ohm winding. The >>> concept of having the AD and antenna line galvanically separated and >>> the antenna input DC-shorted appealed to me since there is no other >>> protection against static. >>> >>> >>> I will give capacitor-coupling a try at some point. >>> >>> >>> A simple LPF is mandatory at least if one plans to use wire antennas, >>> otherwise there is a large risk of interference from VHF FM >>> broadcasting. >>> >>> >>> BR >>> >>> Paul-Henrik, OH1LSQ >>> >>> >>> Quoting Graham : >>> >>>> Paul, >>>> >>>> Q , do you find the transformer feed better than , simply >>>> connecting via a capacitor to the AD ? >>>> >>>> 73-G, >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>> From: >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:38 PM >>>> To: >>>> Subject: Re: LF: MF CW now! >>>> >>>>> Hello Stefan, LF >>>>> >>>>> Your CQ's are 539 here on a Mini-Whip directly into the >>>>> demodulator" -chip on a slightly hardware-hacked RTL-SDR TV >>>>> USB-dongle :-). >>>>> >>>>> The "hack" is just bypassing the VHF/UHF tuner-chip and running >>>>> straight into the +I and -I inputs of the RTL2832U via a 1:4 XFRMR. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No TX here at the moment but receiving you so well on a hacked 10 >>>>> euro USB-dongle and the old MiniWhip is just a tad more than I >>>>> expected... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> BR >>>>> >>>>> Paul-Henrik, OH1LSQ >>>>> Vaasa, KP03SD >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Quoting DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> 472.2 kHz... >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone for a QSO? >>>>>> >>>>>> 73, Stefan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> > > >