Return-Path: Received: from mtain-me04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-me04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.140]) by air-df06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDF061-5ef64cab3e025a; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:02:26 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1366338000117; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 11:02:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P390g-00060e-NI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:00:54 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P390g-00060V-57 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:00:54 +0100 Received: from n5-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([67.195.8.62]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P390e-0007Sr-Ce for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:00:54 +0100 Received: from [67.195.9.81] by n5.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Oct 2010 15:00:44 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.110] by t1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Oct 2010 15:00:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp114.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Oct 2010 15:00:44 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 328279.8638.bm@omp114.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 32946 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Oct 2010 15:00:44 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1286290844; bh=mq9x3AQsMI/LZ8PU8XMhiTWFCThavXc6hzvY9VGzR4E=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SlwOT3QJWsPJzHihqLtlvh6Y1wvexSABAXrTVOA/wx0D6upmv2wZXsguYTMaHNfojD/1UVOG/watM+KKlJ0/Ifny8jUBZ2xBy/tPfR4HWoFsGAhuFxREEReH+mDiwF4aVn2ixSDtqW+mpUc8fjEmD6VE4g2NPO3q0P9XbIX19Is= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CQNY5LRjfJbBU4eoxvWPB/v+5ouPf3vlRvev6ez49sjq5IaeTWo7Anst1Z12tdAvp9BbFC+d2YrzAve5+CcVAfuZ0/DnSN4GmIxP0YsdST0yngm0vXH46ZovSQshg5OVbJrc/X18IGNsy6A6RlT5aSx00eQXdb/tG2hB1xzExe0=; Message-ID: <26222.79702.qm@web111904.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: h16d1ZQVM1mklM122DpQprLdgNjq1QttLVuILuZH1B8o0u. B9WjtiLxxtdlPuJz8BT.89HlAV2J3UG_ElT0mw5WJOPjxnm8RSacltjyxD4x w9bZMvHslPR68PcGW6mNDlfgfGaUsR.K_AI.bI271Fe0CHcfAdufCbzyY9HD gWWAyGbYf6kpBZgfwjg7TFGYo_lFNbXp1JXw79u55s7_YxUv9gYaMMrUOf.F z9sjFawXLf7G_foETuJsqoK8dCCqvw0FhhBIq3YfAdcrW_iI9P6ihiy9gzWG CZoYr Received: from [151.99.187.181] by web111904.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 08:00:43 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/497 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <4CA9BDE0.4000601@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <646839.20132.qm@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4CAA4521.6070301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <242345.444.qm@web111918.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:00:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniele Tincani To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: VLF: Inspire VLF-3 receiver Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1205377338-1286290843=:79702" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m284.2 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608c4cab3dff58f2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0-1205377338-1286290843=:79702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Warren,=20 yes, I see. However, I did=A0not intend to=A0use the=A0VLF-3 for=A0sub-9KH= z ham radio=20 listening, rather I'm looking for=A0a VLF=A0reception solution=A0that I co= uld possibly=20 move away from domestic noise and take with me for a walk in the countrysi= de. My reasoning is: I'm pretty sure :-) that I have hum at home affecting rec= eption=20 below 10KHz. I will try a small passive HPF just to see if it improves thi= ngs a=20 bit, but I'm not confident about this attempt, given that probably the noi= se is=20 not generated by saturation in the pre-amp or the soundcard. Of course the= =20 pre-amp and the soundcard have=A0their own noise floor, but it seems to me= that=20 external noise is well above it. Given this situation, I think that no=20 home-based receiver could really remove the problem at my current location= . On the other hand,=A0I live in a jointly-owned building, at 5th floor, so= it would=20 be not "politically" easy to install a long coax cable across the property= and=20 up to my balcony :-). More complex solutions like remotely-interfaced ante= nnas,=20 etc. are out of my budget for VLF at present (in terms of spare time for= study,=20 setup, etc.=A0:-)). In summary, while trying to improve my current loop and pre-amp,=A0I think= that=20 building an E-probe could add a bit to my current experience with VLF "ant= ennas"=20 and could probably result in a more handy solution for "in-the-field" list= ening=20 sessions. I'm interested in a portable VLF receiver (more general-purpose than VLF-3= , if=20 possible). Ready-to-mount kits are preferable because of the=A0short free-= time I=20 have for homebrewing. Please suggest any suitable solution that you could= have=20 information on. Cheers D. ________________________________ From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Tue, October 5, 2010 4:09:01 PM Subject: Re: VLF: Inspire VLF-3 receiver Daniele, =A0=A0 The Inspire kit is a broadband high gain audio amplifier with a ver= y high=20 input impedance - generically its a 'whistler receiver'. Whistler receivers like Inspire are good for listening to whistlers, tweek= s,=20 dawn chorus etc but it would be completely useless for listening to amateu= r VLF=20 experiments - its broadband, has no 'bfo' to detect a carrier and would be= =20 difficult to interface to a sound card. --=20 73 Warren K2ORS =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XGJ=20 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XSH/23 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XEB/2 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XGR/1 =A0 On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Daniele Tincani = =20 wrote: Hi VLF, > >any opinions about the Inspire VLF-3 receiver kit? >http://theinspireproject.org/uploads/PDF/Theory_of_Operations.pdf >Thank you in advance for your feedbacks. > >Regards >Daniele > =20 --0-1205377338-1286290843=:79702 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Warren,
 
yes, I see. However, I did not intend to use the VLF-3= for sub-9KHz ham radio listening, rather I'm looking for a VLF&= nbsp;reception solution that I could possibly move away from domestic= noise and take with me for a walk in the countryside.
My reasoning is: I'm pretty sure :-) that I have hum at home affectin= g reception below 10KHz. I will try a small passive HPF just to see if it= improves things a bit, but I'm not confident about this attempt, given th= at probably the noise is not generated by saturation in the pre-amp or the= soundcard. Of course the pre-amp and the soundcard have their own no= ise floor, but it seems to me that external noise is well above it. Given= this situation, I think that no home-based receiver could really remove= the problem at my current location.
On the other hand, I live in a jointly-owned building, at 5th fl= oor, so it would be not "politically" easy to install a long coax cable ac= ross the property and up to my balcony :-). More complex solutions like re= motely-interfaced antennas, etc. are out of my budget for VLF at present= (in terms of spare time for study, setup, etc. :-)).
In summary, while trying to improve my current loop and pre-amp, = ;I think that building an E-probe could add a bit to my current experience= with VLF "antennas" and could probably result in a more handy solution fo= r "in-the-field" listening sessions.
I'm interested in a portable VLF receiver (more general-purpose than= VLF-3, if possible). Ready-to-mount kits are preferable because of the&nb= sp;short free-time I have for homebrewing. Please suggest any suitable sol= ution that you could have information on.
 
Cheers
D.
=

From: Warren Ziegler <w= d2xgj@gmail.com>
To:= rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent= : Tue, October 5, 2010 4:09:01 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: Inspire VLF-3 receiver
<= BR> Daniele,
 =   The Inspire kit is a broadband high gain audio amplifier with a ver= y high input impedance - generically its a 'whistler receiver'.
Whistle= r receivers like Inspire are good for listening to whistlers, tweeks, dawn= chorus etc but it would be completely useless for listening to amateur VL= F experiments - its broadband, has no 'bfo' to detect a carrier and would= be difficult to interface to a sound card.


--
73 Warren K2= ORS
                WD2XGJ
=                 WD2XSH/23
 = ;               WE2XEB/2
  &nbs= p;             WE2XGR/1

 
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Daniele Tincani= <danielet= incani@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi VLF,
 
any opinions about the Inspire VLF-3 receiver kit?
http://theinspireproject.org/uploads/PDF/Theory_of_Operations.pdf
Thank you in advance for your feedbacks.
 
Regards
Daniele




<= br> --0-1205377338-1286290843=:79702--