Message-ID: <25ABBD1601E44E7F9331F06E2022921D@IBM7FFA209F07C>
From: "Chris" <c.ashby435@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <33a081ba8fa54d99adcf8022fbb0c07b@kabelmail.de> <981c2fdebe29e7ff448a2bfb7bf53238@sensemail.ch> <1360312446.81440.YahooMailNeo@web133202.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <51151485.8000602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 19:57:07 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0056_01CE0636.79ACA000"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0056_01CE0636.79ACA000
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Personally I don't think it's all bad in a limited sort of way. I would =
welcome an agreement on (1) a section for individual beacons, and (2) a =
defined section for QRSS. At the moment I haven't a clue where exactly =
to monitor. The idea of moving QRSS away from the centre of the band =
(but even nearer the bottom) is preferable. I am sure other mode =
enthusiasts would find it more desirable/helpful to know where to =
listen. Not so sure about the CW calling frequency so high though.
I am surprised CW activity hasn't taken off to a larger extent though, I =
regularly hear strong stations calling CQ over and over, getting no =
replies. Not very encouraging.
Chris, G4AYT.

      From: "traumwandler@sensemail.ch" <traumwandler@sensemail.ch>
      To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
      Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 8:24
      Subject: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan


      Are you aware of this proposal?
      What do you think about it?
      73 de Toni, HB9ASB


      Recommendation
      From the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at the time being) like to =
present the
      following proposal for a 630 m IARU Region 1 bandplan:
      472 - 479 kHz (630 m)
      472 - 475 kHz  CW only =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 200 Hz
          472.000 - 472.150  CW Beacons only (IARU coordinated)
          472.150 - 472.300  CW QRSS
          472.600                    CW DX Calling
          474.750                    CW Calling
      475 - 479 kHz  CW + digimodes =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 500 Hz
      Contests should be discouraged in this very narrow 630 m band =
where radio
      amateurs are secondary users.
      Comment:
      NRRL feels that it will be premature to further subdivide =
different digimodes. This
      may be better to do at the next conference, if necessary, after =
considering
      experiences.









------=_NextPart_000_0056_01CE0636.79ACA000
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=EF=BB=BF<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF-8" http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 8.00.6001.19394">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff text=3D#000000>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Personally I don't think it's all bad =
in a limited=20
sort of way. I would welcome an agreement on (1) a section for =
individual=20
beacons, and (2) a defined section for QRSS. At the moment I haven't a =
clue=20
where exactly to monitor. The idea of moving QRSS away from the centre =
of the=20
band (but even nearer the bottom) is preferable. I am sure other mode=20
enthusiasts would find it more desirable/helpful to know where to =
listen. Not so=20
sure about the CW calling frequency so high though.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>I am surprised CW activity hasn't taken =
off to a=20
larger extent though, I regularly hear strong stations calling CQ over =
and over,=20
getting no replies. Not very encouraging.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Chris, G4AYT.</FONT><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; =
PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"=20
dir=3Dltr>
  <BLOCKQUOTE=20
  cite=3Dmid:1360312446.81440.YahooMailNeo@web133202.mail.ir2.yahoo.com=20
  type=3D"cite">
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: rgb(255,255,255); FONT-FAMILY: =
arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-SIZE: 10pt">
    <DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE=20
    style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; MARGIN-TOP: 5px; =
PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px">
      <DIV style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: =
10pt">
      <DIV=20
      style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: times new roman,new york,times,serif; =
FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
      <DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial><B><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> <A =
class=3Dmoz-txt-link-rfc2396E=20
      =
href=3D'mailto:traumwandler@sensemail.ch"'>"traumwandler@sensemail.ch"</A=
>=20
      <A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-rfc2396E=20
      =
href=3D"mailto:traumwandler@sensemail.ch>">&lt;traumwandler@sensemail.ch&=
gt;</A><BR><B><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> <A =
class=3Dmoz-txt-link-abbreviated=20
      =
href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
</A>=20
      <BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Friday, =
8 February=20
      2013, 8:24<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: =
bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> LF:=20
      NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan<BR></FONT></DIV><BR>Are you =
aware of=20
      this proposal?<BR>What do you think about it?<BR>73 de Toni,=20
      HB9ASB<BR><BR><BR>Recommendation<BR>From the viewpoints of NRRL we =
would=20
      (at the time being) like to present the<BR>following proposal for =
a 630 m=20
      IARU Region 1 bandplan:<BR>472 - 479 kHz (630 m)<BR>472 - 475 =
kHz&nbsp; CW=20
      only =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 200 Hz<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; 472.000 - =
472.150&nbsp;=20
      CW Beacons only (IARU coordinated)<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; 472.150 -=20
      472.300&nbsp; CW QRSS<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; 472.600&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; =
&nbsp;=20
      &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; CW DX Calling<BR>&nbsp; =
&nbsp;=20
      474.750&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; =
&nbsp;=20
      &nbsp; CW Calling<BR>475 - 479 kHz&nbsp; CW + digimodes =E2=80=93 =
maximum=20
      bandwidth 500 Hz<BR>Contests should be discouraged in this very =
narrow 630=20
      m band where radio<BR>amateurs are secondary =
users.<BR>Comment:<BR>NRRL=20
      feels that it will be premature to further subdivide different =
digimodes.=20
      This<BR>may be better to do at the next conference, if necessary, =
after=20
      =
considering<BR>experiences.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR></DIV></DI=
V></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0056_01CE0636.79ACA000--