Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u0LNb5xf003937 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:37:05 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1aMOim-0005dy-5o for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:32:56 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1aMOil-0005dp-NO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:32:55 +0000 Received: from rgout0503.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.224]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aMOhh-0001NF-JU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:32:54 +0000 X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.151.235.197 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: alan.melia@btinternet.com X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090204.56A16A54.00D1,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=39/50,refid=2.7.2:2016.1.13.230617:17:39.532,ip=81.151.235.197,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, FRAUD_ATTACH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODY_SIZE_1900_1999, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[197.235.151.81.fur], HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __PHISH_FROM, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, REFERENCES, NO_URI_HTTPS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from gnat (81.151.235.197) by rgout05.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 568E3D7001A84618 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:31:20 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1453419097; bh=QglcZZJCK0YmsSdylq3ypJStaxtMivg4AH5OAuIFPUc=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=u2FRqnHTyy9alXGVh9pBNYW7okihpYB+9Z1kN2QCcs925aaTK6uB9LwQRRa/CN2+P4yHKVoDPYSZPzR3Aw4pCOaO/I9fO5Bjkx1RIrUpxD693+MKzc8lvjxywF33tBKgtqFX7TAmb9uzgEptilrAnfuPSfmHdkO9dJ1zai05SpM= Message-ID: <24E8E1045C204E9F810F0CF78CD6632E@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <56A1372A.7090504@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:31:30 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Scan-Signature: 3b8620872b19e25fb6f4dfaf1256edc3 Subject: LF: Re: How is this possible? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6443 That is how you put out such a good signal Stefan :-)) Any wire entering the foil is a way into the inside. Even the folds are not proof! currents which circulate round the edges of the foil can be induced and these can radiate into the package. A double skin with the two not connected to gether may be needed. Even the makers of expensive screened rooms have trouble at these levels. Ideally I suppose it should be copper soldered continuously round the seams .....then think of the skin depth at your tx frequency as well......-180dB is quite difficult to achieve :-(( Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "DK7FC" To: Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 7:53 PM Subject: LF: How is this possible? > Hi all, > > While TXing WSPR i'm trying to shield my MF RX in about 30m distance to > the antenna. See attachment. Inside this aluminium foil there is the RX, > a USB stereo soundcard and a 9V-battery plus a DC/DC converter which > produced 5VDC to supply the RX. The cable you can see is the USB cable > going to the PC where i'm watching the input in SpecLab. When TXing, the > signal is still detectable, 25 dB in 1 Hz. > How is this possible? > The foil is connected to the USB ground = the ground of the metallic box > of the RX. The RX stereo input is made out of 2 RG174 cables which are > terminated with 50 Ohm BNC resistors. The complete power supply is below > the foil. > The construction is inside a large building with massive walls! > > Does the foil construction somehow act as a probe, catching a common > mode current which passes an impedance between ground and "earth" so > there is a common mode - differential mode conversion???? > > What is the solution? Bridging ground and "earth" or building a low pass > filter for the USB supply cable? > > 73, Stefan >