Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C520C38000087; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:23:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TjzB1-0004Bb-8P for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:21:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TjzB0-0004BS-Kf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:21:42 +0000 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TjzAy-0006D5-ED for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:21:41 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.46.223]) by mwinf5d02 with ME id bxMH1k0024ouuai03xMHES; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:21:18 +0100 Message-ID: <24E3873949684F759CEC4334BB9AB293@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <1355567137.54916.YahooMailNeo@web132503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <50CC91EF.40009@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <007801cddae9$b16bf590$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <007801cddae9$b16bf590$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:21:16 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ok Mal, We will have to watch and wait, may be the allocation is not a popular as first anticipated , after all , what articles have been published about using the band ? no lectures at the convention on lf/mf or mention in the programme .. with John Gould out of the loop is all this on the back burner ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b183672d2d39521dd5e5027c4d070614 Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF - LF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_010B_01CDDB0A.1E2DDB10" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cc50ccea461717 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_010B_01CDDB0A.1E2DDB10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok Mal, We will have to watch and wait, may be the allocation is not a = popular as first anticipated , after all , what articles have = been published about using the band ? no lectures at the = convention on lf/mf or mention in the programme .. with John = Gould out of the loop is all this on the back burner ? With 5 working days left and no hint as to how to renew the = nov or not as the case may be , strange compared to the = progress made round the 5 meg band , surely the data mountain = must be bigger than the eec butter mountain by now ? , may be we = will all be entitled to a few byte's ?=20 G.. From: mal hamilton=20 Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 5:29 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF - LF Graham I can work Moscow on normal CW on LF and MF so QRSS 60000000000 and = Beacon Bashing is not necessary. Things are going backwards since the = bands were first licensed some years ago.=20 It is difficult to find a CW operator these days on these bands Still no reply to my CQ on 136.5=20 de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Graham=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 4:24 PM Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF - LF There you go , Mal , see these new qso operators , not quite = got the idea yet , you have to wait for the other station to = stop sending , before calling them ... G )))=20 From: Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer=20 Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 3:06 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF - LF Chris,=20 Unattended beacon? Uuuh, i know who will complain, hi ;-) I can see you well in MY QRSS/DFCW-10 window, with some QSB. Tried to = call you, see attachment... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 15.12.2012 11:25, schrieb Chris Osborn:=20 LF/ MF I guess there's still no definitive word from OfCom regarding the = new MF band NOV's (?) It's a possibility that the UK will be an MF-free zone over the New = Year's holiday period . . With that eventuality in mind I've dusted off my old LF TRX and am = at present transmitting a test signal: QRSS-3 on 137.69 kHz I shall put out a few CQ's tonight on LF and would be overjoyed to = receive any response. 73 Chris G3XIZ ------=_NextPart_000_010B_01CDDB0A.1E2DDB10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok Mal,
 
We will  have to  watch and  wait, may  be = the =20 allocation  is  not  a  popular  as  = first =20 anticipated , after all  , what  articles  have  = been =20 published  about  using the  band ?  no  = lectures at=20 the  convention  on lf/mf  or  mention  in = the =20 programme  .. with  John Gould  out of the  = loop =20 is  all  this  on the  back  burner ?
 
With  5  working  days  left  and  = no =20 hint as to how  to  renew  the  nov  = or =20 not  as the  case  may  be , strange  compared = to =20 the  progress  made  round  the  5  = meg  band=20 , surely  the  data  mountain  must  be =20 bigger  than the  eec  butter  mountain by now ? , = may =20 be  we  will  all  be  entitled   to  = a =20 few  byte's   ?
 
G..

From: mal hamilton
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 5:29 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF - LF

Graham
I can work Moscow on normal CW on LF = and MF so=20 QRSS 60000000000 and Beacon Bashing is not necessary. Things are going = backwards=20 since the bands were first licensed some years ago.
It is difficult to find a CW operator these days = on these=20 bands
Still no reply to my CQ on 136.5
de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Graham
Sent: Saturday, December 15, = 2012 4:24=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF - = LF

There  you  go , Mal  , see  these  = new =20 qso  operators  , not   quite  got = the =20 idea  yet  ,  you  have  to  wait  = for=20 the  other  station  to  stop  sending = , =20 before  calling them ...
 
 
G )))

From: Stefan = Sch=C3=A4fer
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: LF: UK - MF - LF

Chris,

Unattended beacon? Uuuh, i know who will = complain, hi ;-)

I can see you well in MY QRSS/DFCW-10 window, = with=20 some QSB. Tried to call you, see attachment...

73,=20 Stefan/DK7FC

Am 15.12.2012 11:25, schrieb Chris Osborn:=20
LF/ MF

I=20 guess there's still no definitive word from OfCom regarding the new = MF band=20 NOV's (?)
It's=20 a possibility that the UK will be an MF-free zone over the New = Year's=20 holiday period . .
With=20 that eventuality in mind I've dusted off my old LF TRX and am at = present=20 transmitting a test signal: QRSS-3=20 on 137.69 kHz
I=20 shall put out a few CQ's tonight on LF and would be overjoyed to = receive any=20 response.
73 Chris=20 G3XIZ


------=_NextPart_000_010B_01CDDB0A.1E2DDB10--