DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=mLK0da3njLIE2dirDzn9FNUzq2mEFwwzNa7pHPxR3/oKlBwt/pzFtlj9oJdXQe8yUebiS1Z9xK2p70sP23XLJtjR/MKComnvBDdH5T7xHqtnAQqf4lC+K880gbQ1s6JRlRUFq+0Iy7Q136iMi0Ste3qDc0nrcbhBFm0WivBg5gk=;
Message-ID: <243915.15548.qm@web28104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
References: <20110103144926.121420@gmx.net> <003501cbab58$13ed4660$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4E4CDEF5-8855-49E9-9F45-BB88C715B612@numeo.fr> <AANLkTimvSbmNtjSNarmOEurS8TWKkAqTctDA6XJuLYF7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 16:58:44 +0000 (GMT)
From: M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimvSbmNtjSNarmOEurS8TWKkAqTctDA6XJuLYF7@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: Re: SAQ transmits Jan. 3rd
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1358235046-1294073924=:15548"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--0-1358235046-1294073924=:15548
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mal I think you are on thin ice there!
=A073 es GL petefmt=20


I support www.NotSpotTelecom.Com your community Telco / ISP.=20




________________________________
From: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Mon, 3 January, 2011 16:37:12
Subject: Re: LF: Re: SAQ transmits Jan. 3rd


Why will a proper Rx give better results than a soundcard?

'JNT



=A0
On 3 January 2011 16:06, John Rabson <john.rabson@numeo.fr> wrote:

Not lazy, just an alternative engineering solution, and for some people a=
 more=20
economical one.
>
>John F5VLF
>
>On 3 Jan 2011, at 16:08CET, mal hamilton wrote:
>
>> Guido
>> A sound card is LMRX (Lazy Mans Receiver). A proper RX and good wire an=
tenna
>> on LF will always give optimum results.
>>
>> g3kev
>
>
>



     =20

--0-1358235046-1294073924=:15548
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><style type=3D"text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></h=
ead><body><div style=3D"font-family:bookman old style, new york, times, se=
rif;font-size:10pt"><DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Mal I think you are on thin ice there!<BR>&nbsp;</DIV>73 es GL petefm=
t=20
<DIV></DIV><BR><BR>
<DIV>I support www.NotSpotTelecom.Com your community Telco / ISP.=20
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: bookman old style, new york,=
 times, serif"><BR>
<DIV style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, tim=
es, serif"><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>
<HR SIZE=3D1>
<B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Andy Talbot &lt;andy=
.g4jnt@gmail.com&gt;<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B=
> rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sen=
t:</SPAN></B> Mon, 3 January, 2011 16:37:12<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIG=
HT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re: LF: Re: SAQ transmits Jan. 3rd<BR></FONT=
><BR>
<DIV>Why will a proper Rx give better results than a soundcard?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>'JNT</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV class=3Dgmail_quote>On 3 January 2011 16:06, John Rabson <SPAN dir=3D=
ltr>&lt;<A href=3D"mailto:john.rabson@numeo.fr" target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofo=
llow ymailto=3D"mailto:john.rabson@numeo.fr">john.rabson@numeo.fr</A>&gt;<=
/SPAN> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dgmail_quote style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0p=
x 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Not lazy, just an alternative en=
gineering solution, and for some people a more economical one.<BR><BR>John=
 F5VLF<BR><BR>On 3 Jan 2011, at 16:08CET, mal hamilton wrote:<BR><BR>&gt;=
 Guido<BR>&gt; A sound card is LMRX (Lazy Mans Receiver). A proper RX and=
 good wire antenna<BR>&gt; on LF will always give optimum results.<BR>&gt;=
<BR>&gt; g3kev<BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></div><=
br>



      </body></html>

--0-1358235046-1294073924=:15548--