Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BBA66100D7; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:02:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SgNX0-0007c0-CU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:01:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SgNWz-0007br-Ow for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:01:13 +0100 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SgNWx-0008WS-UV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:01:12 +0100 Received: from AGB ([2.26.14.151]) by mwinf5d01 with ME id Pa1A1j0063FYniy03a1Af3; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:01:11 +0200 Message-ID: <238E2B3E35364E1090A6A3F982A5CF98@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <4FDDE3C9.8080505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <15B9C0CD09D4429B83AB1E02595502AD@JimPC> In-Reply-To: <15B9C0CD09D4429B83AB1E02595502AD@JimPC> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:01:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120617-1, 17/06/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ''But G4WGT and G0NBD'', // ''is over hilly, lower conductivity ground.'' Steady on Jim , your 'not' suggesting Gary and myself are 'over the hill' !! We did have on the uk500khz site , the beacon plots , that where produced by Andy and Gary, using the G3PLX software and a Tx timing cct from Andy (G4JNT) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: c9c533f07c530c146486ecf89a00ebb1 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Further MF impressions Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:449427520:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ce4fde53f9615e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ''But G4WGT and G0NBD'', // ''is over hilly, lower conductivity ground.'' Steady on Jim , your 'not' suggesting Gary and myself are 'over the hill' !! We did have on the uk500khz site , the beacon plots , that where produced by Andy and Gary, using the G3PLX software and a Tx timing cct from Andy (G4JNT) I think theses are still saved in zip files , or we may still have them saved, these showed quite nicely the path changes over time and the noise level variations , Quite a change to when 'we' first came on 500 with micro erp levels and no dedicated software ! Unless you have quite reasonable power levels and antenna systems , other than local qso , plain CW is not really a option on 500 , luckily with the recent developments, narrow data communications will be possible for all. 73 -G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "James Moritz" Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:06 PM To: Subject: LF: Re: Further MF impressions > Dear Stefan, LF Group, > >> I just thought my receiver isn't working correctly. I thought the xtal >> does not start to oscillate due to the higher ambient temperatures in the >> afternoon. But later i found that the band noise on MF is significantly >> lower than in the evening, at least 20 dB. > > As well as the natural band noise being lower at MF (I estimate the noise > FS is about 10dB lower), there is also not the constant presence of > man-made noise, such as Loran and DCF39 sidebands. So the spectrum around > 500kHz does sound much quieter, especially during daytime. >> >> What do others know about the ground wave range in summer and in the >> afternoon? When does the band open? Similar to LF? > > As others have said, broadly similar to LF - sky wave is very weak until > darkness has arrived, so ground wave dominates daytime communication. > Ground wave signal levels seem to depend greatly on the type of ground at > distances more than 100km or so. For example I can easily hear G3KEV > during the daytime here, and the path from Hatfield to Scarborough is > over flat, high-conductivity ground down the east of England. But G4WGT > and G0NBD, and stations in Wales, are extremely weak in daylight at > similar distances, although they are quite strong after dark The ground > path to these stations is over hilly, lower conductivity ground. > > Sky wave signals over fairly long distances show very deep fading over > periods of a few minutes - signal levels are usually constantly changing, > and I have often seen variation of over 30dB in one minute on beacon > signals. This can make QSOs difficult, with a signal that was R5 suddenly > disappearing completely and not even visible on the spectrogram. Over very > long distances, trans-atlantic for example, the fading seems less severe > although signals are usually quite weak and propagation is very variable. > > For contacts around Europe, I would say 136k actually gives more reliable > signal levels, but for many stations 500k is easier because higher ERP can > be achieved with a small antenna, and noise levels are often lower. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU >