Return-Path: Received: from mtain-ma09.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-ma09.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.17]) by air-dc09.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC091-86054c5af10967; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:12:41 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-ma09.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D410E38000F20; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:11:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Oh3wv-00042W-UX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:09:45 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Oh3wq-00042N-AC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:09:40 +0100 Received: from n4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([67.195.9.84]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh3wo-0005rh-O4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:09:40 +0100 Received: from [67.195.9.82] by n4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2010 17:09:31 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.104] by t2.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2010 17:09:31 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp108.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2010 17:09:31 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 428719.4191.bm@omp108.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 15687 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Aug 2010 17:09:31 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1281028171; bh=++SSWO8zZvGmmNr8kGfFvviy3dKfTgAealmeAJ299cI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=zjDhLp2toGiHLrTEjNw6HGHkzK9okMkUCTIvGx2gtEu1TRtF8sty+zybPkjQOSbOuw3Ph3qXVz8NI7DejnKIdxdbpGA1ILlyOO6nGR7pJQ8vfLkoYHQjE4hXkOwAdPekmUIBrHrp+7PLpE2LEWSMMpxqir8dJ6wDI3O3A9mjbUs= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qwNz6xIgVSEJyH6QTnJkvN7NwF4wn4b/8mpvWki7281eud4F31V375elPjphKPnsWNpjqNOfcWwH4/5pRz9PkQoddU3Sa4pAqU+yAsGiGjrbY2cCA/NdQHzxVwULVYOJUOlLfYmA40WolvxvpVPKEToxaJbFe0ajScG1XkQA0R4=; Message-ID: <218741.86460.qm@web111920.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: gza.V0sVM1lHEsx4UNfzRHshEfuvr6FGIq9j6EuQ5.R6LER hNEoTkMAa_MgVd05IjYn1I__7_MNiOrDdqRAS2DNTo..DC6LVBJ.Sq3E9ynf _DAxtnFxts8xVq458npiyj5P.O3imFfKoGhM3dMuqMaUo8oUbJAWWyuWm.TD m5JG4hLLsKuUfl69zNMDUezwAIP7wDMNaI1h_jett0b3qalvxXmLP_JPrz9j q7se2KtTJOL1mS9bXb9TZ1hOcrIdtNObVKwYapR0OSkh0.yvrqGchRjkoiM0 uXCjVJX.A9FEyFTVC.I5Ni3__Soi6Z46WN7iXmK.AgkTYcO1Kl8RdLFu4sEz ZSQ-- Received: from [82.60.45.190] by web111920.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:09:31 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/459 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <4C58579F.30406@telus.net> <8CD01F14619A000-1C48-3D75@webmail-d073.sysops.aol.com> <8CD02ACE55ECBAC-1CF4-9FFF@webmail-m086.sysops.aol.com> <4C5ABD7D.2080301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:09:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniele Tincani To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <4C5ABD7D.2080301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Bandpass filter design Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1046370048-1281028171=:86460" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m280.1 ; domain : yahoo.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60114c5af0c7087c X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 --0-1046370048-1281028171=:86460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Stefan, LF, may be this could be of some help? http://www.aade.com/filter.htm Regards Daniele ________________________________ From: Stefan Sch=E4fer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Thu, August 5, 2010 3:32:45 PM Subject: LF: Bandpass filter design Dear LF, Currently i am setting up my active antenna for the planned LF grabber her= e in=20 Heidelberg. It is an active E field antenna, using a BF981 and a 125 kHz= signal=20 that transforms the 137 kHz down to 12 kHz where some band filtering has= to be=20 applied. Then, i need another amp stage to drive the soundcards input (BF8= 62).=20 The high impedance of the wire input is first down transformed by a BF862= stage=20 as a source follower, then i allpy a double LF bandpassfilter that is coup= led by=20 a C of some pF (about 4...8 pF). This signal is applied to the 2nd Gate of= the=20 BF981... My question is: There may be better suited filter designs than taking a L= =20 parallel C resonated at 12 kHz (after the mixing stage), between signal an= d=20 ground since this gives a sharp filter, ie 137,7 kHz is already attenuated= by 25=20 dB compared to 137,0 kHz. What i want to have is a filter with a specific= =20 bandwith and edge frequencies with about constant low attenuation in the= =20 transmission range and relative sharp slopes so that 137,7 kHz is not real= ly=20 attenuated but 138,83 kHz (DCF-39) as much as possible. DCF39 is 60 dB abo= ve=20 noise here although it gets already attenuated by the input band filter! Jim/M0BMU has designed a filter for his VLF loop RX that looks quite good.= Is=20 there a web page where i just can type the filter oder, edge frequencies,= input-=20 output impedances and so on and get the values? I have found such one at http://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~fisher/cgi-bin/lc= filter=20 but i am not yet experienced too much about this stuff so i am not sure if= this=20 gives really useful answers. Any other simple ideas to come quickly to the optimal filter type, oder an= d=20 values? I do not want to spend too much time for that, so an "excellent fi= lter=20 design book" is not the best hint ;-) What about a cauer filter? I have read that it has the sharpest edges but= this=20 may cause QRM in the pass band? (like clicks in a too sharp CW filter?) The picture shows what i have done so far. Watching the spectrum on the ro= of=A0 of=20 the institute (the future QTH) from 0...48 kHz in SpecLab looks very promi= sing=20 so far (see picture). DLF is 60 dB above noise although already attenuated= about=20 60 dB! So filtering before mixing and further amplification is necessary= in my=20 case, i assume... Tnx for helping ideas. 73, Stefan/DK7FC =20 --0-1046370048-1281028171=:86460 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Stefan, LF,
may be this could be of some help?
Regards
Daniele
=
=
From: Stefan Sch=E4fer <= ;Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Thu, August 5, 2010 3:32:45 PM
<= SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject: LF: Bandpass filter= design

Dear LF,

Currently i am setting up my active= antenna for the planned LF grabber here in Heidelberg. It is an active E= field antenna, using a BF981 and a 125 kHz signal that transforms the 137= kHz down to 12 kHz where some band filtering has to be applied. Then, i= need another amp stage to drive the soundcards input (BF862). The high im= pedance of the wire input is first down transformed by a BF862 stage as a= source follower, then i allpy a double LF bandpassfilter that is coupled= by a C of some pF (about 4...8 pF). This signal is applied to the 2nd Gat= e of the BF981...

My question is: There may be better suited filter designs= than taking a L parallel C resonated at 12 kHz (after the mixing stage),= between signal and ground since this gives a sharp filter, ie 137,7 kHz= is already attenuated by 25 dB compared to 137,0 kHz. What i want to have= is a filter with a specific bandwith and edge frequencies with about cons= tant low attenuation in the transmission range and relative sharp slopes= so that 137,7 kHz is not really attenuated but 138,83 kHz (DCF-39) as muc= h as possible. DCF39 is 60 dB above noise here although it gets already at= tenuated by the input band filter!

Jim/M0BMU has designed a filter= for his VLF loop RX that looks quite good. Is there a web page where i ju= st can type the filter oder, edge frequencies, input- output impedances an= d so on and get the values?
I have found such one at http://www-users.c= s.york.ac.uk/~fisher/cgi-bin/lcfilter but i am not yet experienced too muc= h about this stuff so i am not sure if this gives really useful answers.

Any ot= her simple ideas to come quickly to the optimal filter type, oder and valu= es? I do not want to spend too much time for that, so an "excellent filter= design book" is not the best hint ;-)

What about a cauer filter?= I have read that it has the sharpest edges but this may cause QRM in the= pass band? (like clicks in a too sharp CW filter?)

The picture sho= ws what i have done so far. Watching the spectrum on the roof  of the= institute (the future QTH) from 0...48 kHz in SpecLab looks very promisin= g so far (see picture). DLF is 60 dB above noise although already attenuat= ed about 60 dB! So filtering before mixing and further amplification is ne= cessary in my case, i assume...

Tnx for helping ideas.

73,= Stefan/DK7FC

--0-1046370048-1281028171=:86460--