From: Claudio Pozzi <smtp01@email.it>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:38:56 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-686-pae; KDE/4.8.4; i686; ; )
References: <555CCC21.4060901@gmx.com> <555CF143.9090403@freenet.de> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A23548558@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be>
In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A23548558@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <201505221338.57024.smtp01@email.it>
Subject: Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

On Thursday, May 21, 2015 08:47:46 you wrote:
> Hello Wolf,
> 
> 
> 
> well said.

What happens if someone flood the internet 'deep search' channel wit a lot of 
fake callsign etc etc? 
Can someone test this flood?

73 de Claudio IK2PII

> 
> From the IARU R1 VHF managers handbook:
> 
> 
> 
> A valid contact is one where both operators have copied both callsigns, the
> report and an unambiguous confirmation. However no recourse should be made
> during the contact to obtain the required information, change of
> frequency, antenna direction, etc. via other methods such as the Internet,
> DX Cluster, talk-back on another band, telephone etc.
> 
> 
> 
> Similar statements are found in other documents such as contest and award
> rules.
> 
> 
> 
> 73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens wolf_dl4yhf
> [dl4yhf@freenet.de] Verzonden: woensdag 20 mei 2015 22:40
> Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Onderwerp: Re: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real?
> 
> Hi Jochen,
> 
> I think the discussion about Opera's own 'deep search' mode (or whatever
> the proper name is) was done here (or on "the other" reflector) over a
> year ago, and the main problem I see is that the 'real time web-based
> exchange' of currently active stations means fooling oneself.
> Consider this: You know there are only four possible callsigns which
> have been transmitting, so in reality the software only has to decide
> for a TWO BIT number. Much easier than "really" decoding the entire
> number of message bits in an Opera message.
> 
> In my very personal point of view, this 'real time web exchange of
> stations (calls) which are currently transmitting' should not be used at
> all.
> For comparison, Markus' (DF6NM's) own deep search uses a quite large
> table which is *static*, which means that his decoder has no chance to
> play unfair (because it doesn't know who's currently active or not), and
> it also doesn't know what others receive (over the internet). What I
> don't know is how many stations are currently in that list, and thus how
> many bits the algorithm effectively has to "decode" (well, it doesn't
> really decode, it also makes a best guess from a limited number of list
> entries to chose from).
> 
> All the additional data which look as if they were "decoded" (eg "VK3ELV
> ... 140w + Top loaded L 18m vert 80m horz") have been taken from a
> database (***including the callsign***), not radio .. the only real
> information  is the '- 37 dB' report, and the two question marks which
> imho may as well have been ten or twenty (considering the season and the
> distance).
> 
> Well just my two pence of wisdom. I don't use Opera and don't think I
> ever will.
> 
> Cheers,
>    Wolf .
> 
> Am 20.05.2015 22:03, schrieb J. Althoff:
> > Hi Wolf,
> > 
> > You are not disappointing me at all. I put this issue under discussion
> > myself.
> > 
> > Please share your opinion about this to this topic to us in detail. Maybe
> > I missed A discussion about this before, but I am very interested in
> > arguments about this Topic.
> > 
> > Thanks, Jochen
> > 
> >     -= DF1VB =-
> >    
> >    -= KH2MM =-
> >   
> >   Jochen Althoff
> >   df1vb@gmx.de
> > 
> > +491712020206
> > 
> >> Am 20.05.2015 um 21:44 schrieb wolf_dl4yhf <dl4yhf@freenet.de>:
> >> 
> >> Sorry to dissapoint you but .. no, no, no, and again, no.
> >> 
> >> 73,
> >> 
> >>   Wolf
> >> 
> >> Am 20.05.2015 20:02, schrieb Jochen Althoff:
> >>> Just popped up at my RX:
> >>> 
> >>> 17:52    477 VK3ELV de DF1VB/3 Op8 Deep Search ?? 16348 km -37 dB in
> >>> Dortmund with 140w + Top loaded L 18m vert 80m horz
> >>> 
> >>> Any comments welcome
> >>> 
> >>> 73, Jochen

-- 
Claudio Pozzi  -  rispondere a  cla.po@tiscali.it

 
 
 
 --
 ZE-Light e ZE-Pro: servizi zimbra per caselle con dominio email.it, per tutti i dettagli 
Clicca qui http://posta.email.it/caselle-di-posta-z-email-it/?utm_campaign=email_Zimbra_102014=main_footer/f
 
 Sponsor:
 Offerta fino al 6 Giugno Bambini gratis formula All Inclusive a euro 41,00 all'hotel Queen Mary di Cattolica, Ingresso omaggio giornaliero alla Spa
 Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=13463&d=22-5