Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6E9F938000086; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 19:49:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TqYyl-00050z-Oc for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:48:15 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TqYyl-00050q-17 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:48:15 +0000 Received: from mbox1.netikka.net ([213.250.81.202]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TqYyj-0001B9-15 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:48:13 +0000 Received: from tupu.netikka.net (tupu [172.16.83.90]) by mbox1-feedback.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23B912803E for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 02:47:51 +0200 (EET) Received: from w3mail-9.netikkabb.fi (w3mail-lb1.netikka.fi [81.209.31.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tupu.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 797DF4B0060 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 02:47:51 +0200 (EET) Received: from www-data by w3mail-9.netikkabb.fi with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TqYyN-0008VI-IQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:47:51 +0200 Received: from t190.ip3.netikka.fi (t190.ip3.netikka.fi [85.157.71.190]) by posti.anvianet.fi (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:47:51 +0200 Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:47:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20130103024751.Horde.pjMPEXziyDJQ5NU3fMlFIoA@posti.anvianet.fi> From: phl@netikka.fi To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <0A4D88A68FCB4F22A2BC40825788A6AA@AGB> <1357150913.48886.YahooMailNeo@web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <63C5AFAA6F8C41A7936F2069D38FAC01@AGB> <81FED2F455C94E45B3BE41353A6D53BC@W1KW> <52B2628757094925BA8206A2C0D9640B@AGB> <1357173044.69099.YahooMailNeo@web133203.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1357173044.69099.YahooMailNeo@web133203.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H4 (5.0.23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: That was SM6BHZ on 508kHz LSB Quoting M0FMT : > Hi Graham Geri and all > > Warren has seen SSB first hand on the MF QRG and we have this side > also.There was an SM station (call sign forgotten?) in the early > days of 500 that added an SSB anouncement on his beacon and it > worked well. > > To my spec. :- "One SSB channel at the high edge of the band only > used during daylight hours no DXing!" add " Use VOX, no > monologuing allowed" to be a laissez faire operation no band plan, > but fair play!.73 es GL es HNY Pete M0FMT IO91UX > > >> >> From: Graham >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Sent: Wednesday, 2 January 2013, 20:48 >> Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? >> >> >> >> Geri >> >> 800 Hz B/W ... May be this is something > 'Wolf' can code for you ? a b/w compression > / expansion module in SL , to limit the tx b/w > to 800 Hz must be possible to divide > by 3 and mult by 3 with a linear > shift as well ? >> >> G.. >> >> >> From: Holger 'Geri', DK8KW - DI2BO - W1KW >> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 8:36 PM >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I kind of like the idea of an SSB channel. I just > pulled out the conditions of my first secial license for 160m from > 1973 or 1974. > That said 1815 to 1835 kHz with 10 Watts in CW, additionally one SSB > channel for > 1832 to 1835 kHz, so why not trying this on 630m, too? Here in Germany we are > currently limited to 800 Hz bandwidt but I am sure we can sork > towards a special > license under certain conditions such as daylight operation only .. sounds > good to me! >> >> Vy 73 >> >> Geri, DK8KW >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Graham >>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 8:58 PM >>> Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? >>> >>> >>> Hi Pete >>> >>> Its quite obvious that the allocation is quite able to >>> support normal armature activity , and why not ? its no >>> longer a experimental allocation , its just the same [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.250.81.202 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 4a8faa6952847c1ec651f883b63fc053 Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40550e4d58d19a9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none That was SM6BHZ on 508kHz LSB Quoting M0FMT : > Hi Graham Geri and all > =A0 > Warren has seen SSB first hand on the MF QRG and we have this side > also.There was an SM station (call sign forgotten?) in the early > days of 500=A0that added an SSB anouncement on his beacon and=A0it > worked well. > =A0 > To my spec. :- "One SSB channel at the high edge of the band only > used during daylight hours no DXing!" add " Use VOX, no > monologuing allowed"=A0to be a laissez faire operation no band plan, > but fair play!.73 es GL es HNY Pete M0FMT IO91UX > > >> ________________________________ >> From: Graham >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Sent: Wednesday, 2 January 2013, 20:48 >> Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? >> >> >> >> Geri >> >> 800 Hz=A0 B/W ...=A0 May=A0 be this=A0 is=A0 something=A0 > 'Wolf' can=A0 code=A0 for=A0 you=A0 ? a=A0 b/w =A0 compression > / expansion=A0 module in SL =A0, to=A0 limit the=A0 tx b/w=A0 > to=A0 800=A0 Hz must=A0 be=A0 possible to=A0 divide=A0 > by=A0 3=A0 and=A0 mult=A0 by=A0 3=A0 with a=A0 linear > shift=A0 as=A0 well ? >> >> G.. >> >> >> From: Holger 'Geri', DK8KW - DI2BO - W1KW >> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 8:36 PM >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? >> >> >> Hi, >> =A0 >> I kind of like the idea of an SSB channel. I just > pulled out the conditions of my first secial license for 160m from > 1973 or 1974. > That said 1815 to 1835 kHz with 10 Watts in CW, additionally one SSB > channel for > 1832 to 1835 kHz, so why not trying this on 630m, too? Here in Germany we= are > currently limited to 800 Hz bandwidt but I am sure we can sork > towards a special > license under certain conditions such as daylight operation only=A0.. sou= nds > good to me! >> =A0 >> Vy 73 >> =A0 >> Geri, DK8KW >> =A0 >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Graham >>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 8:58 PM >>> Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? >>> >>> >>> Hi Pete >>> >>> Its=A0 quite=A0 obvious that=A0 the=A0 allocation=A0 is=A0 =A0quite=A0= able=A0 to=A0 >>> support=A0 normal=A0=A0 armature=A0 activity , and=A0 why=A0 not=A0 ? = its no=A0 >>> longer a experimental=A0 allocation , its just the=A0 same=A0 as=A0=A0= 10=A0 >>> or top=A0 band , un expected=A0 results=A0 today though !=A0 ssb=A0 so= unds=A0 >>> odd=A0 , may=A0 be=A0 as=A0 the=A0 path is=A0 stable ,=A0=A0 sstv ?= =A0 must=A0 be a=A0 >>> narrow=A0 mode=A0 , and the=A0 'new'=A0 digital=A0 voice=A0 is 2KHz=A0= , but >>> that=A0 requires=A0 a=A0 linear=A0 Tx=A0 path=A0 >>> >>> As=A0 for=A0 the=A0 band edge >>> >>> =A0I'm =A0straining=A0 to=A0 find=A0 a=A0 engineering=A0=A0 reason=A0 = , that=A0 wspr=A0 >>> and=A0 qrss=A0 has=A0 decided to=A0 run mid band ?=A0Im sure=A0 users = had a=A0 >>> reasonable discussion=A0 at the=A0 introduction=A0 of the=A0 band , to= =A0 >>> place the=A0 modes=A0 at the=A0 edges ,=A0with=A0 live=A0 cw a the=A0 = lower=A0 >>> portion ?=A0=A0its well=A0 know=A0 that=A0 these=A0 long=A0 carrier= =A0 modes=A0 >>> cause=A0 disruption=A0 to=A0 other=A0 band=A0 users and=A0 are=A0 well= =A0 placed=A0 >>> at the=A0=A0band=A0 edges =A0, 'vanity=A0 beacons'=A0 is a term=A0I h= ave=A0 >>> seen=A0 noted=A0 in referral, as occupancy=A0 increases , by users=A0 = >>> not=A0 linked or=A0 even=A0 aware=A0 of=A0 =A0discussions=A0=A0 taking= place on >>> these=A0 groups , i'm sure there=A0 will=A0 be=A0=A0problems=A0 leadin= g=A0 to=A0 >>> the=A0 introduction=A0 of =A0band plan's=A0 , for=A0 some=A0 the=A0 pl= ans=A0 >>> form=A0 part of the=A0 licence=A0 conditions .. >>> >>> Is Opera=A0 a vanity=A0 system=A0? , actually=A0 no, it=A0 compliments= =A0=A0 >>> ros-=A0 data=A0 mode in that=A0 the=A0 ave s/n=A0=A0 readings=A0 can b= e used >>> to=A0 determine=A0 if=A0 a=A0 path=A0 will=A0 support=A0 the=A0 data= =A0 mode , >>> each=A0 having=A0 the=A0 same=A0=A0 averaging=A0 s/n=A0 reading=A0 tak= en along >>> the=A0 time=A0 line =A0, >>> >>> 73 -G.. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: M0FMT >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 6:21 PM >>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? >>> >>> >>> Hi all >>> =A0 >>> One SSB channel at the high edge of the band only used during >>> daylight hours no DXing! >>> >>> >>> 73 es GL es HNY=A0Pete M0FMT IO91UX >>> >>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> From: Graham >>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 2 January 2013, 16:13 >>>> Subject: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? >>>> >>>> >>>> Quite=A0 intriguing=A0 propagation=A0 on this=A0 'new'=A0 band >>>> >>>> From=A0 some=A0 unexpected=A0 early=A0 600 mile=A0 +=A0=A0 Opera=A0 d= ecodes=A0 >>>> last=A0 night=A0 , to=A0 several=A0=A0 wspr=A0=A0 TA=A0 decodes ,=A0 = [G8's=A0 again >>>> ..]=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0to=A0=A0 today's=A0=A0 test=A0 with=A0 Gary=A0 usin= g=A0=A0 USB-SSB=A0 voice , >>>> >>>> Where=A0 as=A0at=A0=A0=A01300z=A0 =A0we=A0 had=A0 5/9=A0 signals each= =A0 way=A0 as=A0 >>>> expected=A0=A0 over 25 miles=A0 ,=A0 GI3PDN=A0=A0 Ray=A0 , called=A0 = on CW , >>>> to=A0=A0 give=A0 a=A0 report of=A0 5/9 across=A0 the=A0 Irish=A0=A0 S= ea=A0 , some=A0 >>>> 100=A0 miles=A0 for=A0 our=A0 two=A0 signals , his=A0 CW also=A0 in t= he=A0 >>>> 5/9/9=A0 region, one=A0 wonders=A0 how=A0 far=A0 inland=A0 the signal= s=A0 >>>> travelled=A0 ? >>>> >>>> After a=A0 short 3=A0 way=A0 qso,=A0 we closed the=A0 test=A0 round 1= 330z=A0 >>>> ,=A0 may=A0 not=A0of been =A0quite=A0 as=A0 sociable=A0 after=A0 dark= =A0 , but=A0 >>>> with a=A0 small=A0 Ae=A0 , 40 x 70=A0 ft=A0 iv L=A0 and=A0=A0 35=A0 f= t=A0 Top load=A0 >>>> vert=A0 , 50=A0 watts=A0 pep=A0 , results=A0 defiantly=A0=A0 superior= =A0 to=A0 >>>> say=A0 160=A0 mtrs=A0 using=A0 the=A0 same=A0 Ae's >>>> >>>> 73 -G >>>> G0NBD >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>