Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B82F03800009F; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:40:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tkx4u-0003B1-N1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:19:24 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tkx4u-0003As-71 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:19:24 +0000 Received: from mbox1.netikka.net ([213.250.81.202]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tkx4r-0002ic-Uf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:19:23 +0000 Received: from hupu.netikka.net (hupu [172.16.83.91]) by mbox1-feedback.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7678F12847E for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:19:00 +0200 (EET) Received: from w3mail-8.netikkabb.fi (w3mail-lb1.netikka.fi [81.209.31.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hupu.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 898C84B0052 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:19:00 +0200 (EET) Received: from www-data by w3mail-8.netikkabb.fi with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tkx4W-0004fz-C5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:19:00 +0200 Received: from proxy.wartsila.com (proxy.wartsila.com [194.251.142.28]) by posti.anvianet.fi (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:19:00 +0200 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:19:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20121218151900.Horde.LUPwVerSz0VQ0G1ETST0OzA@posti.anvianet.fi> From: phl@netikka.fi To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20121218092921.Horde.h2yZX_rSz0VQ0BtRPVIC2uA@posti.anvianet.fi> <20121218100332.Horde.2ASBc_rSz0VQ0CNU8mNkBhA@posti.anvianet.fi> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H4 (5.0.23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Dimitrios, Yes lets share ideas and progess, hope I managed to get any crystals (very odd way of ordering and I don't know if I actually got any yet). There is already one mighty fine built example on the net, but no schematic provided: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.250.81.202 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 20fb97b64762a0bd80c12a4b2f6724b0 Subject: Re: LF: FT-241A xtals? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600a50d07231553b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Dimitrios, Yes lets share ideas and progess, hope I managed to get any crystals (very odd way of ordering and I don't know if I actually got any yet). There is already one mighty fine built example on the net, but no schematic provided: http://www.cchidgey.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/500_KHz.html On a side note there seems to have been a goldrush after those X-tals because now there is suddenly only one channel available within the band giving 473.6kHz but this is very close to NDB SA lower sideband at 473.5kHz. BR Paul-Henrik, OH1LSQ Quoting Dimitrios Tsifakis : > I am glad you found the eBay seller and your project is about to be > revived. A VFO, as David G4DMP mentioned before, is also another valid > option. It shouldn't be too hard to make a VFO stable enough for 472 > kc, even if it is a valve one! As a test, I built a VFO for 7 Mc using > a 6C4 oscillator and a 6AG7 as a BA - it was perfectly good for CW > work. > > I hope we can exchange more technical information about both projects > here. Maybe this will be a source of inspration for others that have > considered the possibility of using valves for a 472 kc transmitter. > > 73, Dimitris VK1SV > > > 2012/12/18 : >> What a coincidence Dimitros! >> >> After answering to your posting I did a search on Ebay for FT-241 crystals >> and found the same seller - an order has already been made :) >> >> Many thanks for bringing up this subject - I had lost hope already. >> >> >> >> Paul-Henrik, OH1LSQ >> >> >> Quoting Dimitrios Tsifakis : >> >>> Hi Paul-Henrik, >>> >>>> Yes, the same thought has been on my mind for a long time now. The >>>> problem >>>> is that fundamental X-tals for this frequency band are nearly >>>> unobtainable. >>>> I have even tried to custom order some new ones for me and a couple of >>>> friends but never succeeded - the quantities would need to be much larger >>>> for this type of crystals. (They use a different kind of cut as compared >>>> to >>>> crystals for say 3500kHz which can still be ordered custom fairly easily) >>>> >>>> Hopefully people with a stash of suitable vintage X-tals will wake up >>>> when >>>> the new band opens for real and put some up for sale if they don't want >>>> to >>>> use them themselves. >>> >>> >>> I bought a few crystals from this ebay seller: >>> >>> >>> http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/FT-241-CRYSTALS-Many-to-choose-from-You-pick-/260897401407?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3cbeb26a3f&_uhb=1#ht_4373wt_1188 >>> >>> There seem to be a few left. They are sold as-is, but I found that the >>> majority of the ones I bought worked OK. There may be other sellers on >>> eBay. >>> >>>> I'd say go for it - I have built a couple of "MO-PA" transmitters for >>>> 80/160m, they are really pleasant and rewarding projects with a distinct >>>> sound of their own. This is especially true if you also key the >>>> oscillator. >>> >>> >>> I have built recently a similar transmitter for 40 m, using a 6CL6 and >>> an 807. When I keyed the oscillator together with the PA, I couldn't >>> get it to behave properly, so I added a switch to leave the oscillator >>> on and key only the cathode of the PA. I only key the oscillator when >>> I want to draw some attention with the home-brew sound! >>> >>> In general, I have had difficulty sourcing a HV transformer suitable >>> for an 807. In the past, I found that one can build a voltage doubler >>> or quadrupler, with modern electrolytics, it is a viable alternative. >>> The 6.3 V for the filaments I found I can get from a 6 V transformer. >>> Hint: it's easy to add extra turns on a toroid type transformer :-) >>> >>> 73, Dimitris VK1SV >> >> >> >> >>