Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B4EAC38000086; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 04:05:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TfoQG-0008LW-Bl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:04:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TfoQF-0008LN-Vp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:04:11 +0000 Received: from mail.foreach.it ([213.254.15.250] helo=for01.foreach.it) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TfoQE-0003cs-EM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:04:10 +0000 Received: by for01.foreach.it (Postfix, from userid 65534) id DD6FD285205; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:03:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by for01.foreach.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994B5285203 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:03:48 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ebirds.it Received: from for01.foreach.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (for01.foreach.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jf4fXVtqjgl3 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:03:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from imac2 (host185-41-static.24-87-b.business.telecomitalia.it [87.24.41.185]) by for01.foreach.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452E6285201; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:03:48 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:03:47 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" From: Marco IK1ODO -2 In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB5C6C9@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna. kuleuven.be> References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB5C6C9@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20121204090348.994B5285203@for01.foreach.it> X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 213.254.15.250 (mail.foreach.it) used invalid HELO/EHLO for01.foreach.it - verification failed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: And there is nothing about PLC, only the secondary service statement. Marco IK1ODO / AI4YF At 09:04 04-12-12, Rik Strobbe wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: RE: 137kHz Rules and Regs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d409050bdbccd56f5 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none And there is nothing about PLC, only the secondary service statement. Marco IK1ODO / AI4YF At 09:04 04-12-12, Rik Strobbe wrote: >in most European countries the access to the 2200m band is based on >CEPT/ERC Recommendation 62-01 E that states that "the band >135.7-137.8 kHz may be used with a maximum e.r.p. of 1 Watt on a >secondary basis by the Amateur Service in CEPT countries" > >So it's 1W ERP instead of 1W EIRP, a 2.15dB difference (in favour of ERP). > >For most stations however this limit is not an issue as due to >practical restrictions they don't run more than some 10 or 100mW. > > > >73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T