Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.134]) by air-dc08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC082-862c4cd1f08a2f4; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:30:18 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4DD3C380016D8; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:30:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PDmlA-00069W-6Q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:28:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PDml9-00069N-Qa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:28:51 +0000 Received: from anchor-post-2.mail.demon.net ([195.173.77.133]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PDml7-0003Rn-8B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:28:51 +0000 Received: from sighthound.demon.co.uk ([80.177.174.126]) by anchor-post-2.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1PDml5-0003Iy-l8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:28:47 +0000 Received: from opc1 (opc1.twatt.home [192.168.21.16]) by svr3.twatt.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E181BEEF for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:28:47 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:28:46 +0000 From: John P-G To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <20101103232846.10db0491@opc1> In-Reply-To: References: <4CD1CD51.2010103@kpnmail.nl> <1288819317.4cd1d275cc0bf@imp.netikka.net> <000f01cb7ba6$b2802040$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <1288825676.4cd1eb4c162d3@imp.netikka.net> Organization: The Gammy Bird X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.0; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: WSPR window Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40864cd1f0892e54 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:17:58 +0000 Andy Talbot wrote: > Most transceivers can be operated in split mode now, isn't this a > workable solution ? > And anyone with separate Tx / Rx setups has got split frequency > operation by default Andy, LF, Yes, I can (and have done) operate in Split mode - as I have separate RX and TX - but my point is that we should all be in the same place - I believe the concerns over "strong locals will drown the weak DX" is fallacious. As long as the string locals aren't transmitting 100% duty cycle there is room for all on a single 200Hz frequency span. You only have to compare the density of active stations of 500kHz with those on 30m to see. John GM4SLV