Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dd05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dd05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.145]) by air-de01.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDE012-5ea34b4a4cff58; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:56:15 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dd05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id ADCDA38000073; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:56:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NU5kT-0005t8-1F for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:55:01 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NU5kS-0005sz-JK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:55:00 +0000 Received: from cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NU5kQ-0004xn-Nh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:55:00 +0000 Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.75]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDDD7B802A; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:54:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail6.cc.kuleuven.be (webmail6.cc.kuleuven.be [134.58.242.53]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2F1F3862; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:54:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by webmail6.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix, from userid 48) id A62C818056; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:54:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from 135.147-247-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (135.147-247-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [81.247.147.135]) by webmail6.kuleuven.be (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:54:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20100110225447.qai3f5xv0gwkkocw@webmail6.kuleuven.be> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:54:47 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , Roger Lapthorn References: <000e01ca9223$6d16ec90$0517aac0@desktop> <20100110204914.7slzdzt6skoww4so@webmail6.kuleuven.be> <9afca2641001101154y7b99110l20c6ab44435d4213@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9afca2641001101154y7b99110l20c6ab44435d4213@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2) X-Originating-IP: 81.247.147.135 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Link budget calculation or estimation of dist for given power on WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40914b4a4cfc0083 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Roger, Jim, On Alan's (G3NYK) website =20 (http://www.alan.melia.btinternet.co.uk/simple.htm) I found: Allow for an extra "hop loss" of 12dB for every ionospheric =20 "reflection" and 6dB for a land "bounce", say about 1dB for a sea =20 "bounce". Thus an extra hop would "cost" 13 to 18dB (+ free space loss ?) 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Quoting Roger Lapthorn : > Do we know how many dB loss (over land and over sea) for a single hop Ri= k? > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > 2010/1/10 Rik Strobbe =20 > > > Jim, > > if ionoshperic propagation is involved signal strength (and thus =20 > SNR) depends more of the number of hops involved than the absolute =20 > distance. > And each hop "costs" a number of dB's in signal strength. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > > Quoting James Cowburn =20 > >: > > Dear LF, > Has anyone any ideas or suggestions on a resource for calculation of =20 > a link budget for WSPR over a set distance? > As it seems I can get up to GM4SLV reasonably consistently on my =20 > current antenna/power setting with a SNR of around -22dB and the =20 > limit for WSPR is around -30dB then is there a means for roughly =20 > estimating or indeed accurately calculating the Expected Max Range =20 > (EMR) at that power setting and antenna configuration? > Clearly, there are differences between separate Rx stations but if =20 > one knows the ratio between two or more Rx stations then it should =20 > be possible to pro-rate or estimate at least the signal strength at =20 > a given Rx based on its performance with other known signals. > If I can do 916km with an SNR of say -22dB then how much further =20 > would the remaining 8dB or so of WSPR detection get me, assuming =20 > the other Rx has the same capability as GM4SLV and if their =20 > capability is different, then is it fine to factor for the dB =20 > difference over known paths/signals? > Thanks in advance for any answers or pointers and best wishes to all =20 > for a great 2010 > With best regards > > > Jim > > > Dr. James Cowburn G7NKS > E =20 > james.cowburn@virgin.net> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM > G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 >