Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dg09.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dg09.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.17]) by air-df06.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINDF063-5ef84b39ccab24; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:32:27 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dg09.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C1DBB380000BC; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:32:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NPYQ9-00089n-Mo for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:31:17 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NPYQ9-00089e-91 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:31:17 +0000 Received: from smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com ([195.200.78.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NPYQ7-0002d2-AO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:31:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 2381 invoked by uid 507); 29 Dec 2009 10:31:00 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO JR) (john.rabson@numeo.fr@217.67.155.178) by smtp.qtxt.dns-iol.com with SMTP; 29 Dec 2009 10:31:00 +0100 Message-ID: <200912291031040414.59AABDD1@smtp2.numeo.fr> In-Reply-To: <000f01ca7fc2$c666f6a0$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> References: <1542517694@web.de> <6F962616C1CC4C1B844AF099CB1BB55D@lindavideo> <000f01ca7fc2$c666f6a0$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:31:04 +0100 From: "John RABSON" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: RE: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX signals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41114b39ccaa31e5 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Agreed we should be careful. My Creative Labs soundcard (external USB) ha= s SPDIF optical connectors as well as electrical. The Optical Out connect= or emits a faint red light but I can't find any mention of safety in the= user manual. F5VLF *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 18/12/2009 at 09:16 mal hamilton wrote: >Radio Amateurs BEWARE - Appliance Operators DO NOT TOUCH > >G3KEV > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ken" >To: >Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:43 AM >Subject: LF: Re: RE: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX >signals > > >> Optical fibres are fine for transmission and remove all the problems of >> interference and cross talk at a stroke, but please be careful and >observe >> optical safety precautions when using lasers and other light sources.= I >> worked on optical systems for many years during my time with BT, and >optical >> safety took priority over every thing else. All optical fibres need to >have >> a perfect cleave on the ends, and the connectors be absolutely clean,= if >> you are not launching into an optical connector then alignment will be= a >> problem, similarly at the receive end. >> >> >> 73. >> Ken >> >> M0KHW >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Horst St=F6cker" >> To: >> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:01 AM >> Subject: LF: RE: Noise cancelling by using optic transmission of RX >signals >> >> >> In theory it's a good Idea which I had some weeks before without workin= g >it >> out. >> >> Years before I also have made tests with FTA (free to air) optical >> transmissions with a DL2CH-Transceiver and a TRX-Kit by Aatis which is >quite >> much simpler. >> Even with that it was no problem to link between two points about a few >> meters. >> >> In this case you should think about an IR-LED. Unfortunately, the Aatis >> receiver has a photo transistor instead of a diode. But it should be no >> great deal to modify that. >> >> The problems with FTA optic transmission for this application are imho: >> - You have to be sure, that no one can be injured by the laser beam, >> especially at unattended operation. >> - Think about how many hours/the beam has it's full power before becomi= ng >> much weaker. >> - The optics must be kept clean. This could be a problem if the units= are >> out of reach. >> - The units have to be mounted absolutely stable. For Example, on a >swinging >> fibre rod you'll never bring a laser beam exactly to the rx area. >> >> I bet, (FTA) optical transmission just changes one problem with a few >> others. >> >> But the transmission with optical cable seems interesting. >> >> What type of cable do you suggest? I do not think, my TOS-Link cable >would >> stand weather/UV and mechanical conditions outside for a long time. >> >> Horst DO1KHS >> ___________________________________________________________ >> Preisknaller: WEB.DE DSL Flatrate f=FCr nur 16,99 Euro/mtl.! >> http://produkte.web.de/go/02/ >> >> >> >>