Return-Path: Received: from rly-de07.mx.aol.com (rly-de07.mail.aol.com [172.19.170.143]) by air-de02.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDE021-4ee4af6e65062; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:40:20 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-de07.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDE077-4ee4af6e65062; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:40:01 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1N79qw-0006w0-Ls for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:38:54 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1N79qw-0006vr-5x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:38:54 +0000 Received: from cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.44]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1N79py-000142-GF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:37:55 +0000 Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.75]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFD051C009 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:38:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail6.cc.kuleuven.be (webmail6.cc.kuleuven.be [134.58.242.53]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B748FF3862 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:38:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by webmail6.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix, from userid 48) id 58A0918056; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:38:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from 12.168-240-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (12.168-240-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [81.240.168.12]) by webmail6.kuleuven.be (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:38:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20091108163840.lo5b6gea88oc448g@webmail6.kuleuven.be> Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:38:40 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" References: <001b01ca6086$cd0966b0$0617aac0@jimdesk> In-Reply-To: <001b01ca6086$cd0966b0$0617aac0@jimdesk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2) X-Originating-IP: 81.240.168.12 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Losses due to ant in tree? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hello Jim, my antenna is surrounded by numberous birch and oak trees. 4 of them =20 in fact act as antenna support. As a result I have a relately high antenna loss: 130-200 Ohm on 137kHz =20 and 45-70 Ohm on 500kHz (low values in winter, high values in summer). I try to keep a distance of at least 2m between any "hot" antenna wire =20 and the greenery. I would recommend not to go much closer to avoid =20 extra losses and certainly not touch branches (not even with isolated =20 wire) as with high voltages this could start a fire due to arcing. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Quoting James Cowburn : > Hi All, > > The vertical 5m section of my inverted L runs up into the branches =20 > of a silver birch tree. The wire goes over a large bough at 5m or =20 > so and then comes out of the branches for some 22m down to a 4m high =20 > pole attached to the garage. > > Has anyone a guesstimation of the losses in signal caused by running =20 > the wire through the tree? > > Using vertload and tophat2 I calculate the antenna to be around =20 > 0.25% efficient but this assumes it is in free space. Can anyone =20 > suggest a figure for the additional loss due to tree heating! > > The vertical element is actually sloping at about 20 degree from the =20 > tree down to the loading coil. The length is nearer 6metres but =20 > the vertical height over ground at the bough is about 5m. > > (Santa may be bringing me a set of swaged poles with which to build =20 > mark 2, well away from the silver birch!) > > With best regards > > > Jim > > > Dr. James Cowburn G7NKS >