Return-Path: Received: from rly-dc01.mx.aol.com (rly-dc01.mail.aol.com [172.19.136.30]) by air-dc09.mail.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDC093-b034a0689161cd; Sun, 10 May 2009 03:58:21 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dc01.mx.aol.com (v123.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDC017-b034a0689161cd; Sun, 10 May 2009 03:58:17 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1M33uh-0006Uo-2a for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 May 2009 08:57:35 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1M33ug-0006Uf-MR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 May 2009 08:57:34 +0100 Received: from cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.43]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1M33ue-00078R-WB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 May 2009 08:57:34 +0100 Received: from smtps01.kuleuven.be (smtpshost01.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.74]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CE57B8053 for ; Sun, 10 May 2009 09:56:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (webmail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.242.4]) by smtps01.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C7D31E702 for ; Sun, 10 May 2009 09:56:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by webmail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 6DB735A41; Sun, 10 May 2009 09:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 221.47-201-80.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (221.47-201-80.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [80.201.47.221]) by webmail4.kuleuven.be (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sun, 10 May 2009 09:56:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20090510095654.xh9zsb9jlzfkgos8@webmail4.kuleuven.be> Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 09:56:54 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4A045BA9.60002@btconnect.com> <8bf118410905080936v26db00dbh1610abc103aa78f2@mail.gmail.com> <4A046BAF.3050108@btconnect.com> <3F6DE782D2D2480F809F0FDBBF1E9DF0@AGB> <00a401c9d017$709814d0$6401a8c0@asus> <00b101c9d01b$bbd34790$6401a8c0@asus> <20090508233722.rtzv6nsxw9j4wsgc@webmail4.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <20090508233722.rtzv6nsxw9j4wsgc@webmail4.kuleuven.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2) X-Originating-IP: 80.201.47.221 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: RE: MFSK 4 , 503.00 cent Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Dear all, last night I worked Graham in THROBX2 mode and a bit later in PSK31. Under the given conditions (lot of QRN and QSB) THROBX performed better than PSK31. MFSK4 seems far inferior (at least here). Nice to have a 2-way data QSO on 500 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T