Return-Path: Received: from rly-db06.mx.aol.com (rly-db06.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.81]) by air-db05.mail.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILINDB052-ad249b05186226; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:26:26 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db06.mx.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB068-ad249b05186226; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:26:15 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LfM0d-0002MI-Hq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:25:43 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LfM0d-0002M9-0w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:25:43 +0000 Received: from cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.44]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LfM0c-00048i-6F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:25:42 +0000 Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.75]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7C051C002 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:25:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680FDF3863 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:25:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail1.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (webmail1.cc.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.242.3]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D861F3862 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:25:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by webmail1.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 423D92C70; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:25:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from 250.43-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (250.43-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [81.241.43.250]) by webmail3.kuleuven.be (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:25:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20090305232535.w824u5fnf0isckok@webmail3.kuleuven.be> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:25:35 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2) X-Originating-IP: 81.241.43.250 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: weak signal on 502kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) I heard some replies to my CQ calls on 502kHz (5 March 22:00 - 22:20 UTC) but the signal was to weak to copy (also due to high QRN). Who called ? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm