Message-ID: <20090225220221.ok9eiyg30p444cg8@webmail4.kuleuven.be>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:02:21 +0100
From: Rik Strobbe <Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <009201c99767$6fb3cd90$6401a8c0@asus>
In-Reply-To: <009201c99767$6fb3cd90$6401a8c0@asus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2)
Subject: Re: LF: 500khz wspr spreadsheet
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=UTF-8;
	DelSp="Yes";
	format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Gary,

the gap in my data is due to the fact that I was using the RX / =20
antenna otherwise.
Just one remark regarding the data: keep in mind that it is SNR (not =20
signal strength). I have my LF antenna at a rather remote location in =20
the garden. Nearest houses, street light and other possible QRM =20
sources are at least 50m from the antenna and at my own house most =20
local QRM sources have been eliminated. This might explain the =20
relative "good" values.

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

Quoting Gary - G4WGT <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>:

> Hi LF,
>
>
>
> I have created a MS Excel spread-sheet for my WSPRing last night. I have
> uploaded it to my website as it is too large for the LF group forum. On
> three worksheets there is a graph in marker format, a graph in line format=
 &
> the data from the five stations who reported to the WSPR Spots page.
>
>
>
> It is my first attempt at an Excel chart, please let me know what you thin=
k.
> It can be downloaded at :-
>
>
>
> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/WSPR01.xls
>
>
>
> 73,
>
>
>
> Gary - G4WGT - IO83QP.
>
>
>
>



Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm