Return-Path: Received: from rly-md09.mx.aol.com (rly-md09.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.147]) by air-md02.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMD024-922497f80ef38; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:47:46 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md09.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD092-922497f80ef38; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:47:31 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LRvm8-0006Zc-K7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:47:16 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LRvm8-0006ZT-7O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:47:16 +0000 Received: from sighthound.demon.co.uk ([80.177.174.126]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LRvm6-0001Su-CV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:47:16 +0000 Received: from lurcher (lurcher.twatt.home [10.0.0.8]) by deerhound.twatt.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F6A3B648 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:47:08 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:47:08 +0000 From: John P-G To: Message-ID: <20090127214708.59a7e2b4@lurcher> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.465,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.166 Subject: LF: G0NDB WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hello LF, Graham, Just started WSPR again, and see a nice bright trace at approx 503.965 in the 20:40 slot, but again no decode. I see no-one else reported a successful decode on WSPRnet at that time either. Looks like still some problem? The 21:44 transmission, fainter on the waterfall decoded with reported S/N of -10dB Very strange! John