Return-Path: Received: from rly-dg04.mx.aol.com (rly-dg04.mail.aol.com [172.19.151.88]) by air-dg01.mail.aol.com (v121_r5.5) with ESMTP id MAILINDG011-5bb497e3f141d9; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:54:32 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dg04.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDG042-5bb497e3f141d9; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:54:13 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LRaKz-0002U6-Pp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:53:49 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LRaKz-0002Tx-El for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:53:49 +0000 Received: from sighthound.demon.co.uk ([80.177.174.126]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LRaKy-00025Y-PF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:53:49 +0000 Received: from lurcher (lurcher.twatt.home [10.0.0.8]) by deerhound.twatt.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE923B355 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:53:42 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:53:42 +0000 From: John P-G To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <20090126225342.5af9e594@lurcher> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: G0NBD difficult to decode Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hello LF, I'm seeing really strong signals from G0NBD, and it was decoding earlier, but now I seem to be unable to get a decode from what should be a good string (positive S/N ratio) signal. I see at WSPRnet that Graham is not being received by quite as many stations as I'd have expected. I wonder if there's some strangeness with the soundcard sample rates at either the TX or RX end? I've read some reports that strong signals often don't decode, when weak ones are fine, and sample rates are involved? Graham, the signal is making it here, bright red on the waterfall, but the last 3 periods have failed to decode. John