Return-Path: Received: from rly-mh10.mx.aol.com (rly-mh10.mail.aol.com [172.21.166.146]) by air-mh07.mail.aol.com (v121_r5.5) with ESMTP id MAILINMH071-bfa496cd1327c; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:37:16 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mh10.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMH102-bfa496cd1327c; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:36:53 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LMnBt-0005ms-PX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:36:37 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LMnBt-0005mj-CD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:36:37 +0000 Received: from mail06do.versatel.de ([89.245.129.26]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LMnBq-0004Bd-Q0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:36:37 +0000 Received: (qmail 23814 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2009 17:36:34 -0000 Received: from webmail01.versatel-nord.de ([62.214.102.231]) (envelope-sender ) by mail06do.versatel.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Jan 2009 17:36:29 -0000 Received: from i59f63dbb.versanet.de (i59f63dbb.versanet.de [89.246.61.187]) by webmail.versatel.de (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:36:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20090113183625.al3lh1j9nidc40sk@webmail.versatel.de> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:36:25 +0100 From: uwe-jannsen@versanet.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <003301c9759e$c21f3f00$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> In-Reply-To: <003301c9759e$c21f3f00$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) X-Originating-IP: 89.246.61.187 X-Karma: 0: X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: Re: LF: Antenna Diversity Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Hi Mal, pse see also http://home.versanet.de/~uwe-jannsen/two.htm regards Uwe/dj8wx Zitat von mal hamilton : > LF/MF > I am experimenting at present with antenna (space diversity) using > two loops. Loop A is 40 metres perimeter vertical orientation, Loop B > is 190 metres perimeter also vertical. Both loops optimum E/W. > I am using two receivers in this experiment Ant A to Siemens D2155 > level meter, BW 20 Hz and vy stable, Ant B to Datong up converter and > IC746 250 Hz BW. Both audio outputs to soundcard/ARGO display > allowing 50 hz separation for observation. > Observing DI2AM at present and having calibrared this signal on both > RX outputs at a point in time, both signals are fairly constant but > more variations have been observed on Ant A - 40m loop, the signal > surges in strength and then fades down, whereas Ant B has a more > constant output with less fade. > More time is needed for a proper assessment and DI2AM is also a > strong signal. I would need a few long haul signals for a proper test > like Russian or USA . > Interested in MF signals at present. > This method would also work with a couple of small loops or a loop > and probe type antenna, then at a glance one would know how each was > performing, of course with the loop in the optimum direction for > target signal. > > This is just a simple setup, it works well and no audio cross mod > noticed, nice clean signals on display in spite of the fact that the > separation is only 50hz. > A nice balanced mixer would be a more sophisticated approach, that > might come later. > > 73 mal/g3kev > >