Return-Path: Received: from rly-ma06.mx.aol.com (rly-ma06.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.50]) by air-ma08.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA081-8b44922b9d73c5; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:49:47 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-ma06.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMA066-8b44922b9d73c5; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:49:29 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1L2Q1A-0002Nc-Rf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:49:20 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1L2Q1A-0002NT-Az for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:49:20 +0000 Received: from cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.43]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L2Q19-0006NS-DE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:49:20 +0000 Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.75]) by cavuit01.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D417B804D for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:49:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909E7F3863 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:49:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from dell-rik.fys.kuleuven.be (dhcp-10-33-85-199.fys.kuleuven.be [10.33.85.199]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58551F3866 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:49:05 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:49:28 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe In-Reply-To: <4802F93A3F1D46E393BFFD61B3213C2E@DennisPC> References: <4802F93A3F1D46E393BFFD61B3213C2E@DennisPC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20081118124905.58551F3866@smtps02.kuleuven.be> X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.452,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: RX Aerials, Wire Loops v Ferrite Rods Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_73007109==.ALT" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 --=====================_73007109==.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Hello Dennis, it was GI4DPE beaconing last night on 501.5 kHz. Finbar was peaking 589 here. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T At 13:29 18/11/2008, you wrote: >Hi Everyone > >Just finished a top band natter last night at 2015 UTC when I heard >WI4DPE beacon rst 539 on approx. 501.5kHz. Must tell someone as it >is first time I have heard anyone on this band outside the UK, so my >experimental loop aerials can't be all bad. The signal from the >fixed 1metre loop hammered on the back fence looking North South was >slightly worse than the 8" ferrite rod mounted in an ice cream box >on a post 1m high and looking 20 degrees West of North. I would >welcome any views on wire loops v ferrite rods on the 600m band? > >Dennis M0JXM Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm --=====================_73007109==.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Hello Dennis,

it was GI4DPE beaconing last night on 501.5 kHz.
Finbar was peaking 589 here.

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

At 13:29 18/11/2008, you wrote:
Hi Everyone
 
Just finished a top band natter last night at 2015 UTC when I heard WI4DPE beacon rst 539 on approx. 501.5kHz.  Must tell someone as it is first time I have heard anyone on this band outside the UK, so my experimental loop aerials can't be all bad.   The signal from the fixed 1metre loop hammered on the back fence looking North South was slightly worse than the 8" ferrite rod mounted in an ice cream box on a post 1m high and looking 20 degrees West of North.   I would welcome any views on wire loops v ferrite rods on the 600m band?
 
Dennis M0JXM


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm for more information.

--=====================_73007109==.ALT--