Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:25:54 +0200
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: Rik Strobbe <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be>
In-Reply-To: <000701c91893$a50cabe0$4201a8c0@home>
References: <000701c91893$a50cabe0$4201a8c0@home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20080918102550.7CA58F3862@smtps02.kuleuven.be>
Subject: Re: LF: More odd sigs on 500.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Jim, group,

I didn't notice the QSO as it was after bedtime ;-)
But on several occasions I have noticed that in the early evening 
(18-20UT) the VVV signal is weaker than DI2AM while later on it 
becomes stronger than DI2AM. One could come to the conclusion that 
VVV should have a more western location, but that seems in 
contradiction with bearing that position it in (or beyond) the Baltic area.

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

At 09:04 17/09/2008, you wrote:
>Dear LF Group,
>
>I had the RX on monitoring the mystery "VVV TEST" signal to see if it would
>get strong enough to get a better bearing with the loop, when around 2230utc
>I noticed that there seemed to be some sort of QSO going on. Along with
>SK6RUD there seemed to be 3 CW signals between about 500.5 and 501.0 kHz,
>none of which  were very good copy here. The occasional bits I could hear
>sounded like some sort of amateur QSO with RST reports, Q codes and so on,
>but no recognisable callsigns! Did anyone else notice anything - maybe we
>have company...
>
>Cheers, Jim Moritz
>73 de M0BMU


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm