Return-Path: Received: from rly-dc09.mx.aol.com (rly-dc09.mail.aol.com [172.19.136.38]) by air-dc09.mail.aol.com (v121.5) with ESMTP id MAILINDC093-b3e487f09da34d; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 04:59:15 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dc09.mx.aol.com (v121.5) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDC092-b3e487f09da34d; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 04:59:10 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1KJPJq-0000Dz-F5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:58:34 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1KJPJp-0000Dq-UO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:58:34 +0100 Received: from cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.44]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KJPJk-00087Y-IG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:58:33 +0100 Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.75]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A63451C824 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:58:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45068F3863 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:58:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (webmail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.242.4]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD62F3862 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:58:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by webmail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix, from userid 65534) id DED6C5562; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:05:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 148.72-65-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (148.72-65-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [87.65.72.148]) by webmail4.kuleuven.be (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:05:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20080717110533.ji3so2ex15i0w8ok@webmail4.kuleuven.be> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:05:33 +0200 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <006e01c8e788$ca7394c0$0900a8c0@AM> In-Reply-To: <006e01c8e788$ca7394c0$0900a8c0@AM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2) X-Originating-IP: 87.65.72.148 X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: satellites Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Dear all, I don't know about RSGB and RadCom but I am closely involved in UBA =20 and it's magazine (CQ-QSO). There are probably as many opinions about the contents of a magazine =20 as there are readers. So a good editor should try to keep the balance =20 between all those interests. For CQ-QSO the "mix" is more or less 1/3 UBA affairs (informing =20 members), 1/3 non technical stuff (DX-pedition reports and other "easy =20 reading") and 1/3 technical stuff. Even within the technical stuff a =20 balance has to be found between various topics and levels. Not easy at =20 all ... But the main problem to maintain this "mix" is the input of articles. =20 The UBA affairs part is more or less produced automatically (as the =20 output from discussions, meetings etc.). Further we receive plenty of =20 "easy reading" stuff, so no problem to fill that part. But it is an =20 endless struggle to get good technical articles. And no input =3D no =20 output ;-) As said, I don' know about RSGB and RadCom, but I wouldn't be =20 surprised if the situation is similar. So maybe everyone who feels that there must be more technical articles =20 should think about writing one ? A simple "math exercise" we once did: - CQ-QSO is a bi-mothly magazine and has 44 pages =3D 264 pages/year - UBA has about 3000 members So if every member would write a 1 page tech article every 10 year we =20 could fill our magazine from the first to the last page with tech =20 artciles. Being more realistic: assuming that - 10% of our members (=3D 300) is technical involved - we want to fill 1/3 of the magazine (=3D 88 pages/year) with tech stuff - the average tech article is 3 pages (=3D 30 articles/year) Again it comes one 1 tech article (per technical involved meber) every =20 10 years Sounds so easy .. but is so hard. 73, Rik ON7YD Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm