Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <200702081030590366.3DC11533@smtp.wanadoo.fr>
In-Reply-To: <005f01c74b03$71820540$0200a8c0@AUG2004>
References: <8E8D23D235D70840B6582917DF27898006935A76@temps153538.tms-ltd.com>
 <200702071032460924.389C5D59@smtp.wanadoo.fr>
 <005f01c74b03$71820540$0200a8c0@AUG2004>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:30:59 +0100
From: "John RABSON" <john.rabson@wanadoo.fr>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: RE: UK e-Loran station out to tender
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Ah! What I was really concerned with was whether the QRM level would be=
 noticeably different with the proposed enhanced modulation.

Or is there some way we could use the received signal to improve=
 cave-to-surface communications?  It sounds impossible but you never know.

73
John

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 07/02/2007 at 21:58 Walter Blanchard wrote:

>It means you can use it for free.
>Walter G3JKV.
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "John RABSON" <john.rabson@wanadoo.fr>
>To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:32 AM
>Subject: Re: LF: RE: UK e-Loran station out to tender
>
>
>> It looks as if they're adding an additional pulse after number eight
>(for 
>> a slave) or nine (for a master).  Does anyone have any idea what this
>will 
>> do to the transmitted spectrum, particularly around 136 and 87kHz?
>>
>> 73
>> John G3PAI/F5VLF
>>
>> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
>>
>> On 04/01/2007 at 12:34 Reeves Paul wrote:
>>
>>>Interesting to note that it is to be a   '.....complimentary.....'
>>>system!!
>>>I can only dread to think about the technical side of things, all those
>>>sidebands......
>>>Nit-picking mode off.
>>>
>>>73s
>>>Paul      G8GJA
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>> 
>
>
>-- 
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.