Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <20061014114406.smdja8s46e8k4k8k@webmail.versatel.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:44:06 +0200
From: uwe-jannsen@versanet.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: 	<7D653C9C42F5D411A27C00508BF8803D06F3DAAE@mail.dstl.gov.uk><20061013173653.akwlctzadpm8s4ko@webmail.versatel.de><005b01c6eeed$80a51480$0300a8c0@lark>
	<20061014005137.9e85gpqi0p5wwook@webmail.versatel.de>
	<000c01c6ef1d$136df0a0$0300a8c0@lark>
In-Reply-To: <000c01c6ef1d$136df0a0$0300a8c0@lark>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3)
Subject: Re: LF: GPS Locked test transmission
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Zitat von Alan Melia <alan.melia@btinternet.com>:

> Hi Uwe, i would think it would be better fot Andy to avoid exact frequecies
> like that also I wonder if you were receiving a line from CFH which is
> centred there and has been active the last few nights. It is not so strong
> at the moment but is visible on Spectran here, as a noisy 200Hz wide band.
> (GMSK)
> Cheers de Alan G3NYK
>
Hi Alan,
I guess it was the LORAN emission Markus mentioned because it was absolute
stable in phase. as far as I know the CFH QRG isn`t GPS disciplined.

since 0900UTC I do receive that carrier agn. coming night we will find out
whether it is G4JNT or not.

regards
Uwe/dj8wx