X-GM-THRID: 1214340522046595664 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 61341274353267c6d5cdb70c95e58a47d7c3be34 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.250.20 with SMTP id x20cs843148qbh; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.8.4 with SMTP id l4mr10173810nfi; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id m15si14683200nfc.2006.09.12.13.29.23; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1GNEo6-0002qW-2H for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:24:34 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1GNEo5-0002qN-Gw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:24:33 +0100 Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.240.42]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GNEo1-00031z-CV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:24:33 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BB81D7571 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:23:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp02.kuleuven.be (lepidus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.72]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3181D739B for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:23:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp02.kuleuven.be (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5416E2CAACF; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:23:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail1.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (webmail1.cc.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.242.3]) by smtp02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442B32CAA37 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:23:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by webmail1.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 6ED1D1A9847; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:23:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 210.180-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (210.180-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [81.241.180.210]) by webmail3.kuleuven.be (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:23:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20060912222350.r2vrdllm28kc40gk@webmail3.kuleuven.be> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:23:50 +0200 From: Rik Strobbe To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001f01c6d697$50508da0$86be3b3e@fujitsu> In-Reply-To: <001f01c6d697$50508da0$86be3b3e@fujitsu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2) X-Originating-IP: 81.241.180.210 X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 Subject: Re: LF: top loaded vertical and trees?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4318 Hello Dick, my 136 kHz antenna (in the period 1997-2001) was completely surrounded =20 by trees and actually I use 4 of this green lossy capacitors to =20 support the antenna. My experiences: 1. Loss is very high. I never got it below 130 Ohm in winter and 160 =20 Ohm in summer. 2. Keep the wires as far as possible from the greenery. 3. An elevated loading coil works miracles. Putting about 50% of the =20 needed inductance at the top of the vertical wire improved my ERP by 6 =20 dB. More than 50 % would be even better, but that was to heavy in my =20 case. 4. Even with an elevated loading coil measured ERP was at least 5 dB =20 below the theoretical value. 5. Due to the losses the antenna Q is that low that re-tuning within a =20 1 kHz range is not required (at least one advantage). 6. Due to friction nylon ropes do not last very long in a tree. I used =20 steel cables at the friction points. 7. The combination of wind and Murphy's law will make the trees that =20 support the antenna always moving in opposite directions. Even with =20 moderate wind 3 mm flexible Cu-wire easily snaps at 15 meter height =20 (when it is streched 1-2 meter). An easy and cheap cure is to include =20 so-called "bicycle strechers" (the rubber things used to fix something =20 at the rear of a bicycle) in the supporting ropes. 8. The easiest way to get wires 15-20 meter up in a tree is a =20 slingshot or bow/arrow (the later is more accurate). To end with a positive note: all the above didn't stop me from working =20 almost all stations that were active at that time. Best DX was OH1TN =20 (+/- 1700 km) in normal CW. My DFCW30 signal was captured in the US at =20 least once but I cannot remind when and by who. 73, Rik ON7YD Quoting Dick : > I think this question has been around a while ago, but can't =20 > remember exactly. > > What about running an toploaded vertical in the middle of an wood? > > It will be a 12m vertical wire, with an flat, pancake shaped coil on =20 > top, and additional at least 4 toploading wires > each 20m long, supported by trees....... > > So, nearest tree will be over 25m away from antenna. > > What about negative influence (attentuation) caused by the trees? > > I'm asking this because it might be rather difficult to find a free =20 > place for the antenna in LX. > > (We will be QRV 136kHz upto 10m, so lot of antennas, masts around ,hi) > > Dick, pa4vhf Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm