X-GM-THRID: 1204825919009180825 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 6a0354e5d9c3dddc3da679132b23420f55c44c75 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.72.5 with SMTP id u5cs8312wra; Tue, 30 May 2006 13:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.144.8 with SMTP id r8mr381nfd; Tue, 30 May 2006 13:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id l21si5612450nfc.2006.05.30.13.34.12; Tue, 30 May 2006 13:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) DomainKey-Status: good (test mode) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FlAt8-0000Fi-5r for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 21:32:26 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FlAt7-0000FY-M1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 21:32:25 +0100 Received: from web25404.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.10.138]) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FlAt3-0000X3-Eu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 21:32:25 +0100 Received: (qmail 68934 invoked by uid 60001); 30 May 2006 20:31:15 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=W09ZvnEcn9p31DKK0YcViv8pJl799u2CWhbGs0EcejEGrxsCvRGo2NGQUGo6gGw34xcW9fZ12tmyUj0WKUD/hWZQugHC9ctPVFHlo2f9jGXhXdGfvcCRZ7C1vCV9iQ8gO2oRRE6PBbAKqb6zAN6Hijvg+Ih6iLxJV7ITP96zqc4= ; Message-ID: <20060530203115.68932.qmail@web25404.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.78.182.231] by web25404.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 30 May 2006 21:31:15 BST Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 21:31:15 +0100 (BST) From: brian hodgson To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <447C9379.11105.E56D34@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-1.300,HTML_30_40=0.056,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: TU in Morse Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2013028889-1149021075=:66105" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 6984 --0-2013028889-1149021075=:66105 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit TU certainly had me confused when I first started receiving on 136. When I was using RTTY in the 70's and 80's, TU and its longer version BTU meant "To You" and "Back To You". Have not used RTTY for many years so don't know whether it is still in use. Brian, G3YKB Mike Dennison wrote: TU means "thank you" and is more efficient (particularly in QRSS) than TKS or TNX. Mike, G3XDV ========== > I have always assumed TU to be "To You", perhaps someone will > confirm!!! > > 73 > > Gary - G4WGT > --------------------------------- Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail . "The New Version is radically easier to use" � The Wall Street Journal --0-2013028889-1149021075=:66105 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
TU certainly had me confused when I first started receiving on 136. When I was using RTTY in the 70's and 80's, TU and its longer version BTU meant "To You" and "Back To You". Have not used RTTY for many years so don't know whether it is still in use.
 
Brian, G3YKB

Mike Dennison <mike.dennison@ntlworld.com> wrote:
TU means "thank you" and is more efficient (particularly in QRSS)
than TKS or TNX.

Mike, G3XDV
==========

> I have always assumed TU to be "To You", perhaps someone will
> confirm!!!
>
> 73
>
> Gary - G4WGT
>


Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail . "The New Version is radically easier to use" � The Wall Street Journal --0-2013028889-1149021075=:66105--