Return-Path: Received: (qmail 62743 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2005 10:44:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2005 10:44:16 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D6RMb-000C0j-Mx for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:45:59 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D6RMW-000Byl-EM for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:45:53 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1D6RKo-000B50-1Q for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:44:06 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1D6RKd-0003TD-Bl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:43:55 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1D6RKb-0003S8-Sy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:43:53 +0000 Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.231]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6RKa-0005o9-64 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:43:53 +0000 Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D6RKX-0000F4-00 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:43:49 +0000 Received: from john-b5a82ea1a4 (bts-0503.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.49.247]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id j22AhcDJ017505 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:43:48 GMT Message-ID: <200503021043400489.121C37C9@mail.zetnet.co.uk> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (K) Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:43:40 +0000 From: "John Rabson" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.247.47.231 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of zetnet.co.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Locators Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Many thanks everybody for your suggestions. Latitude and longitude would certainly be the most widely used way of indicating my location, but in practice the information I have been given about the sites I shall be working from is expressed as NGRs. As I do not expect to achieve a great range in the experiments, the best way is probably to take the NGRs and convert them to lat/lon so as to be bilingual. Regards, John Rabson G3PAI