Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80074 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2005 17:02:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Jan 2005 17:02:07 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CvIQB-000Afb-Tk for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:59:38 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CvIQA-000AfQ-Sb for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:59:34 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1CvISY-000LUX-SX for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:02:02 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CvIRW-0004n6-Vg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:00:58 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CvIRW-0004mx-Kg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:00:58 +0000 Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.231]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CvIRT-0003tq-7j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:00:58 +0000 Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CvIRS-0004mT-00; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:00:54 +0000 Received: from john-b5a82ea1a4 (bts-0557.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.50.45]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id j0UH0oUa010991; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:00:53 GMT Message-ID: <200501301700500348.10D15813@mail.zetnet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <001e01c506d8$1bd0d2a0$0500a8c0@charter.net> References: <41FCEB2F.10402@ix.netcom.com> <001e01c506d8$1bd0d2a0$0500a8c0@charter.net> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (K) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:00:50 +0000 From: "John Rabson" To: lowfer@lwca.org Cc: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.247.47.231 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of zetnet.co.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Re[2]: [LW] Which is Better? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Depending on the particular topic, it might also be worth while posting it to rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, which deals principally with 137kHz, including transatlantic and transpacific communications. John Rabson G3PAI *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 30/01/2005 at 14:29 John Andrews wrote: >David, > >> If I'd like a post to be read by the wider lowfer community, >> would it be best to post it to the reflector, or >> to the message board on lwca.org? > >It wouldn't hurt to do both. The LWCA Message Board is read by Lowfers and >by folks who have interests in NDB chasing, VLF monitoring, etc. The Lowfer >reflector is specifically aimed at the 137 kHz and 160-190 kHz crowd. But >there is no reason not to post Lowfer-related news in both locations. > >I have read your posts on the Message Board regarding the SSB modules, and >am curious about their frequency stability. > >John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES > > > > >________________________________________ >File attachments, if any, have NOT been virus scanned...check before >opening! >To subscribe, unsubscribe or get other help, see http://lwca.org/groups.htm