Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22748 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2003 17:50:18 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 2 Jul 2003 17:50:18 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 25863 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2003 17:50:11 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Jul 2003 17:50:10 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19Xli6-0004Gc-4z for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 18:48:02 +0100 Received: from [212.216.176.222] (helo=vsmtp2.tin.it) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19Xli1-0004GS-Pv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 18:47:57 +0100 Received: from base (212.171.197.106) by vsmtp2.tin.it (6.7.016) id 3EE0613200A50A63 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 19:47:53 +0200 From: "valerio gabbani" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:59:20 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: <003601c33e1a$edc3cd90$fe78a8c0@W1KW> <5.1.0.14.0.20030701120928.025a8290@gemini.herts.ac.uk> In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20030701120928.025a8290@gemini.herts.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <200307021559.20646.valerio@dii.unisi.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Subject: Re: LF: SAQ nil Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_KMAILversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false On Tuesday 01 July 2003 13:22, James Moritz wrote: > Dear Valerio, LF Group, > > At 20:08 30/06/2003 +0200, you wrote: > >i also tried to listen to SAQ on Sunday morning around 8:30 UTC, but with > > my great surprise i heard a strong RTTY station at 17.2 kHz. > >I use a RACAL 1772 receiver > > Perhaps a silly suggestion, but a mistake I have made more than once...:-) > The RA1772 in CW mode displays a frequency 1kHz lower than the actual > receive frequency - so to receive SAQ you have to tune the RA1772 to > 16.2kHz. If the display reads 17.2k, you will be receiving the data sigs > around 18.3kHz. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU Jim, yes i made a stupid mistake, i usually use TS-940 in CW so i forgot that RA1772 use only SSB and the display shows the zero hertz beat frequency. I walked around a couple of kilohertz, but probably i was too fast and impatient. Thanks for info, '73 Valerio IK5ZPV