Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17435 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2002 23:47:44 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 23 Aug 2002 23:47:44 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 1051 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2002 23:48:06 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Aug 2002 23:48:06 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17iPre-00063J-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 02:37:22 +0100 Received: from web13308.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.175.44]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17iPrd-00063E-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 02:37:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20020823234512.21053.qmail@web13308.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.125.44.226] by web13308.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:45:12 PDT Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:45:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael Silvers" Subject: Re: LF: Re: toroid cores To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-reply-to: <010701c24ae4$82c76620$862965d5@oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Johan & All, I may be mistaken but I think the picture is of a very large diameter 3E25 from the colour code like a TL58/41/18-3E25 or TL102/66/15-3E25. A 3F3 should be blue according to my datasheets; check the web. The 5i (published initial permeabilty) for 3F3, 3C85, 3E25 are approx 1800, 2000, 5500, respectively. Regardless, still TU for the data point anyways. 73 de Mike KB6WFC k .. --- Johan Bodin wrote: > Hello Rik > > Ferrite (as opposed to iron powder) is best for > power transformation on LF > because of its high permeability, fewer turns = less > copper loss. Iron powder > is better for resonant circuits and filters because > of higher flux saturation point > and it has better inductance stability and low loss > / high Q. > > The best material for 136 kHz transformers, as far > as I know, is Philips 3F3 > which has approximately half the core loss compared > to 3C85, and 3C85 is > good! SM6PXJ and I used a 58mm 3C85 toroid as auto > transformer for > antenna matching on our 7S6SAJ expedition. The > antenna resistance was > 7..8 ohms (most of this was radiation resistance! > :o) and the transformer was > only slightly warm to the touch after running QRSS > with about 1 kW output > from Christers TX. Just a couple of watts lost, I > would guess. The winding was > made with 2.5 sq.mm flat wire (not Litz). > > I have Philips ferrite data sheets in pdf format > that I can send if you are > interested. > > Attached picture shows the transformer in action at > 7S6SAJ. Note the full scale > deflection on the 10A thermocouple "ammeter" in the > icecream container. > Christer checked the meter later and found that 10A > indicated was actually > 12A RF... (photo by SM6PXJ) > > 73 de Johan SM6LKM > > > > I am trying to make a list of toroid core material > that is suitable for > > 136kHz power applications, for impedance > transformers and low-pass filters. > > I would appreciate any information about the > material (brand-type), the > > application (transformer or filter) and the power > level it was used/tested. > > > > many thanks in advance, > > > > 73, Rik ON7YD > > > ATTACHMENT part 2 image/tiff name=trafo.jpg __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com