Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10730 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2002 11:00:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 7 Jan 2002 11:00:02 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 6818 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2002 11:00:07 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 7 Jan 2002 11:00:07 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16NXQv-0003Ps-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2002 10:55:13 +0000 Received: from nat20.excitenetwork.com ([63.236.75.68] helo=xprdmailfe.excite.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16NXQu-0003Pl-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2002 10:55:12 +0000 Received: by xprdmailfe.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 1BE1D3DC8; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 05:53:24 -0500 (EST) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: Re. GPS Coherant PSK Transmission From: "john sexton" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: computernetworks@excite.com X-Mailer: PHP Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <20020107105324.1BE1D3DC8@xprdmailfe.excite.com> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 05:53:24 -0500 (EST) Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi All,
Do we need to stick with this bandplan? When it was devised it reflected interests at that time among a rather small group.
Things have moved on since then.
Most activity is in the miniscule TA slot or at the very top of the band. So isn't it time to revisit this plan, to make a more sensible distribution, reflecting the interests of everyone?

Any proposals?
73 John, G4CNN