Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25114 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2001 19:49:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 22 Jan 2001 19:49:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 8215 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2001 19:43:44 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 22 Jan 2001 19:43:44 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14KmnN-0003Pp-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 19:38:29 +0000 Received: from indyweb.cgocable.ca ([205.151.69.200]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14KmnL-0003Pk-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 19:38:28 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from 220-131.lr.cgocable.ca (220-131.lr.cgocable.ca [24.226.220.131]) by indyweb.cgocable.ca (8.9.3 (MessagingDirect 1.0.4)/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA22911580 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:38:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <200101221938.OAA22911580@indyweb.cgocable.ca> X-Sender: bill1@cgocable.ca X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:36:47 -0500 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Bill de Carle" Subject: Re: LF: VA3LK Log / More Tests Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: At 01:22 PM 1/22/01 +0000, Jim, M0BMU wrote: >In correspondence with Larry on the subject of a possible 2 way >QSO, the need for some receiving tests in the Europe -> North >America direction has become obvious. Both VA3LK and VE1ZZ >can be received fairly routinely here by several stations, however >so far only VE1ZJ has definitely seen any Eu signals (most >recently in cooperation with VE1ZZ of course). Since John is >probably stuck with 60Hz noise problems at his QTH until the >weather warms up, now is a good time to make a concerted effort >to see what signals can be received by other NA stations. > >Since 3s/dot slow CW has not been good enough for this so far, I >suggest we do something like this: As many European stations as >possible transmit very long dashes (90seconds for example), within >a very narrow frequency range (perhaps 20Hz maximum - 10Hz >would be better), which has been selected by the interested parties >on the North American side as most suitable for reception. This >way, high resolution spectrograms can be obtained by the >receiving stations of a frequency range containing all the strongest >available signals. At the moment this seems to be the most >sensitive weak-signal detection method available. > >Once a positive result has been obtained, we will have a handle on >the signal levels that can be expected, and will be able to make an >intelligent guess at the appropriate modulation techniques, QSO >formats, etc. that will work for a 2 way QSO. > >I guess there are several stations on both sides of the pond who >already have the equipment needed to take part, so how about >doing something in the next week or so? I'm interested and would monitor for weak signals. I'll be out of town next week-end but other times OK. Bill VE2IQ