Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>
Received: (qmail 3185 invoked from network); 18 May 2000 10:25:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70)  by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 18 May 2000 10:25:46 -0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12sNOs-0003T1-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 May 2000 11:19:30 +0100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12sNOp-0003Sw-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 May 2000 11:19:28 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Received: from central.zetnet.co.uk (central.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.20]) by irwell.zetnet.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with SMTP id LAA11101 for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Thu, 18 May 2000 11:19:05 +0100
X-ZSender: g3ldo@zetnet.co.uk
Message-ID: <2000051810113968199@zetnet.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 10:11:39 +0100
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: "Peter Dodd" <g3ldo@zetnet.co.uk>
X-Mailer: ZIMACS Version 1.20c 10000836
Subject: LF: Re: LF receivers
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

I am working on the Receiver chapter for the LF book. I have a good 
introduction written by John 4GVC (with a description of the TS850, 
which caused many of us, including myself, to go this route) but 
would like to bring it up to date in the light of your collective 
experience. While I was up at Crawley I found that Derek was using 
the 990 to good effect.
What is your favorite receiver and how does it compare with others 
that you might have tried?


-- 
Regards, Peter, G3LDO

<g3ldo@zetnet.co.uk>