Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1718 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2000 10:29:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by teachers.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 7 Feb 2000 10:29:28 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12HlKS-0002p3-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2000 10:23:36 +0000 Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12HlKP-0002oy-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2000 10:23:33 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from central.zetnet.co.uk (central.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.20]) by irwell.zetnet.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with SMTP id KAA21375 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:23:22 GMT X-ZSender: g3ldo@zetnet.co.uk X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <2000020710145268199@zetnet.co.uk> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:14:52 GMT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Peter Dodd" X-Mailer: ZIMACS Version 1.20c 10000836 Subject: LF: Re: LF Propagation and modelling Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit IK1ODO wrote: > >What is the vertical radiation pattern of our shortened > >verticals? Is it dependent of ground resistance and nearby > >objects? may we model it? ON7YD wrote > From what I found in old handbooks (60's and before, when LF was more > 'fashionable' for the commercials) the radiation pattern of a short > vertical is independent of its length (height). This seem to be true. According to EZNEC the polar diagram of an electrically short antenna is the same which ever way you configure it. So an inverted L or V or a T antenna all have the same polar diagram - a sort of half doughnut. As the height of a vertical is increased to a quarter wavelength the polar diagram remains the same although the radiation resistance decreases, which means that the 1W erp can be achieved with less power. > But if we want to make 'DX-QSOs' with 1 Watt ERP we definitely need > ionospheric wave propagation, so producing some higher angle radiation > might be useful. True. If the near quarter wave has a large horizontal component (as the OH1TN and MM0ALM antennas) then the polar diagram changes so that some of the radiation angle is high. We have noticed interesting propagation effects with both these stations and they both have good 'ears'. As regards modelling the effect of ground EZNEC is quite useful in this regard. In fact if you select 'High-Accuracy Ground' calculations it produces what is known as a Sommerfield-Norton interpolation table of ground characteristics based on the ground complex permittivity. This is described on page 6.10 of the 'LF Experimenter's Source Book'. In short this allows modelling of the ground effect of antennas for 136kHz provided any horizontal component of the element is over 10m high. In general, the ground 'quality' has little effect on the shape of the polar diagram although it has a marked effect on antenna efficency.. I have not seen a method of modelling electromagnetic obstacles such as buildings and trees. -- Regards, Peter, G3LDO