DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=rJe0e4EI+/T+Uvx5knbqQF8fiAUquqMffwNDWNz0bcLNdV76TZ0kW+kRmfVxfkZHGb
         lMWODLjcfSGsfD1d5FWExGm+hY9NZFV6Q7Xe7IWI/q0wnpbR5DctTFkQKus3U0XczB4O
         08GGrUz+grytFPZnnTpE5HTLLmn0hoKZ9xrhw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00bf01ca526d$0da572e0$0217aac0@jimdesk>
References: <1442410468@web.de> <00bf01ca526d$0da572e0$0217aac0@jimdesk>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:38:02 +0100
Message-ID: <1f0624b90910211038x19430b34q24eb31a45b664fb1@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gary - G4WGT <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Best receiving antenna wanted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d34524cb5d99047675705c
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


--001636d34524cb5d99047675705c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Horst, Jim, LF,
Same here, I have used a PA0RDT Mini-Whip active antenna for a good while
now & it's performance is very good right down to 10kHz, may even go lower
if I knew what to look for !!!

My online grabbers use the Mini-Whip antenna.

73,

Gary - G4WGT.

2009/10/21 James Cowburn <james.cowburn@virgin.net>

> Hi Horst
>
> I've just installed one of Roelof Bakker's (PA0RDT) active mini whips an=
d
> it
> is excellent at my QTH.  Just my view, others may have different
> experiences
>
> With best regards
>
>
> Jim
>
>
> Dr. James Cowburn G7NKS
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Horst St=F6cker
> Sent: 21 October 2009 17:26
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: Best receiving antenna wanted
>
> Hello,
> now that I am happy with my selectiv level meter Praecitronic MV-62 I am
> looking for the best receicing antenna.
> Especially I am interested in 400khz, 136kHz, 72kHz and below 22 kHz. Wi=
th
> my 40m longwire reception is not good enough and with a frame antenna of
> 900m copper wire it was disappointing, too..
> I think, an active antenna for 0 to 500 MHz would be the best for me -=
 but
> I
> am looking forward to any other idea.
> vy73 Horst DO1KHS
> _______________________________________________________________
> Neu: WEB.DE DSL bis 50.000 kBit/s und 200,- Euro Startguthaben!
> http://produkte.web.de/go/02/
>
>
>
>

--001636d34524cb5d99047675705c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Horst, Jim, LF,<div><br></div><div>Same here, I have used a PA0RDT Mini=
-Whip active antenna for a good while now &amp; it&#39;s performance is ve=
ry good right down to 10kHz, may even go lower if I knew what to look for=
 !!!</div>
<div><br></div><div>My online grabbers use the Mini-Whip antenna.</div><di=
v><br></div><div>73,</div><div><br></div><div>Gary - G4WGT.<br><br><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote">2009/10/21 James Cowburn <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:james.cowburn@virgin.net">james.cowburn@virgin.net</a>&gt;</spa=
n><br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1=
px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Hi Horst<br>
<br>
I&#39;ve just installed one of Roelof Bakker&#39;s (PA0RDT) active mini wh=
ips and it<br>
is excellent at my QTH. =A0Just my view, others may have different experie=
nces<br>
<br>
With best regards<br>
<br>
<br>
Jim<br>
<br>
<br>
Dr. James Cowburn G7NKS<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href=3D"mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">owner-rsgb_lf_=
group@blacksheep.org</a><br>
[mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">owner-rsgb_l=
f_group@blacksheep.org</a>] On Behalf Of Horst St=F6cker<br>
Sent: 21 October 2009 17:26<br>
To: <a href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">rsgb_lf_group@blackshe=
ep.org</a><br>
Subject: LF: Best receiving antenna wanted<br>
<br>
Hello,<br>
now that I am happy with my selectiv level meter Praecitronic MV-62 I am<b=
r>
looking for the best receicing antenna.<br>
Especially I am interested in 400khz, 136kHz, 72kHz and below 22 kHz. With=
<br>
my 40m longwire reception is not good enough and with a frame antenna of<b=
r>
900m copper wire it was disappointing, too..<br>
I think, an active antenna for 0 to 500 MHz would be the best for me - but=
 I<br>
am looking forward to any other idea.<br>
vy73 Horst DO1KHS<br>
_______________________________________________________________<br>
Neu: <a href=3D"http://WEB.DE" target=3D"_blank">WEB.DE</a> DSL bis 50.000=
 kBit/s und 200,- Euro Startguthaben!<br>
<a href=3D"http://produkte.web.de/go/02/" target=3D"_blank">http://produkt=
e.web.de/go/02/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--001636d34524cb5d99047675705c--